10-06-2008
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2008
>
10-06-2008
>
Minutes
>
10-06-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2008 5:31:58 PM
Creation date
9/30/2008 11:48:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commission Minutes-October 6, 2008 3427 <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett asked who completed the initial study on County Highway 17. Mr. Berndt said <br />SRF Consulting Group conducted the study and provided the estimates used in the <br />contract. Mr. Bennett suggested the county engineer look for other items, i.e. equipment, to <br />remove from the 2009 budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Pawluk asked if contractors have been paid for the County Highway 17 project. Mr. <br />Berndt said a large percentage of the costs have been paid. Mr. Pawluk said the final <br />decision on budget adjustments lies with the county commission, not with a department <br />head. <br /> <br />County Auditor Michael Montplaisir said with an audit, loading tickets and weight scales <br />would be reviewed and the cost of an audit would be based on an hourly rate. However, he <br />noted original estimates from the consultant did not address how to proceed with the project <br />if it was determined that actual costs and quantities were substantially higher than the <br />estimates provided to the county. <br /> <br />Mr. Vanyo suggested a discussion be held between the county and SRF Consulting Group <br />regarding the issues addressed today. Mrs. Sorum asked Mr. Berndt to submit information <br />on the 80 items within the contract for the County Highway 17 project, and she suggested <br />the board review the 2009 Highway Department budget for additional cuts to help pay back <br />the loan from the building fund. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner said the two issues for the board to consider are: how this will affect the 2009 <br />budget and where the funds will come from to balance the budget; and whether to conduct <br />an in-depth review of the contract with SRF Consulting Group. <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Wagner moved and Mr. Vanyo seconded to authorize a budget <br />adjustment to the 2008 Road and Bridge Fund line items and totals listed <br />below; request the County Engineer draft a list of priorities from the 2009 <br />budget for the board to consider possible cuts; and ask the State's <br />Attorney to review the contract with SRF Consulting Group. Discussion: <br />Mr. Bennett said Mr. Berndt could have informed the board about this <br />situation earlier. Mr. Pawluk feels a vote today is premature. Mr. Wagner <br />said the county is obligated to pay the contractors and the motion <br />includes a review of the road budget for possible reductions to help pay <br />back the building fund. On roll call vote, the motion carried with Mr. <br />Wagner, Mr. Vanyo, and Mrs. Sorum voting "Yes"; Mr. Pawluk and Mr. <br />Bennett voting "No". <br /> <br />Fuel Costs <br />Total increase <br /> <br />Increase from $3,700,000 to $7,180,000 <br />Increase from $200,000 to $1,050,000 <br />(2007 anticipated expenditures did not occur until 2008) <br />Increase from $400,000 to $500,000 <br />$4,430,000 <br /> <br />Road Construction <br />Right of Way Costs <br /> <br />8. VOUCHERS, Approved <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Wagner moved and Mrs. Sorum seconded to approve Voucher No. <br />229,870 through Voucher No. 230,223. On roll call vote, the motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.