Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Building Committee-April 9, 2008 1 <br /> <br />CASS COUNTY BUILDING COMMITTEE <br />APRIL 9, 2008-4:25 PM <br /> <br />1. MEETING TO ORDER <br />Committee Chairman Scott Wagner called the Cass County Building Committee meeting <br />to order on Wednesday, April 9, 2008, at 4:25 PM with the following members present: <br />County Auditor Michael Montplaisir; County Administrator Bonnie Johnson; County <br />Commissioner Darrell Vanyo; and County Commissioner Scott Wagner. East Central <br />Judicial District Judge Doug Herman was absent due to a family emergency, <br /> <br />2. MINUTES APPROVED <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Vanyo moved and Mr. Montplaisir seconded that the minutes of the <br />previous meeting be approved as written. Motion carried. <br /> <br />3. REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE FROM COMMISSIONER SORUM <br />Mr. Wagner said Commissioner Robyn Sorum was unable to attend the interviews with <br />consultants last month and has since submitted her comments regarding space needs <br />and financial issues to committee members for their review. <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Montplaisir moved and Mr. Vanyo seconded to forward the <br />comments from Commissioner Robyn Sorum to Dennis Kimme and <br />Rick Hoganson. Motion carried. <br /> <br />4. REVIEW KIMME & ASSOCIATES CORRESPONDENCE <br />Dennis Kimme from Kimme & Associates provided correspondence outlining general <br />observations from interviews held last month. Mr. Wagner reviewed the correspondence <br />with committee members, The consultant's observations included comments regarding <br />the west addition project as well as discussion during the interviews about a complete <br />criminal justice center to be located at the jail site. <br /> <br />Mr, Wagner referred to the amendment to the 2001 contract with Foss Architecture & <br />Interiors for a Courthouse west addition and the current space needs analysis and scope <br />of services, He indicated parts of the general observations outlined in some of the <br />consultant's correspondence are not consistent with the contract addendum or the scope <br />of services approved by the subcommittee. He asked committee members for input on <br />the current scope of services and how they relate to the general observations in the <br />correspondence submitted by Mr. Kimme. <br /> <br />Mr, Vanyo wants to visit with the consultants regarding the general observations before <br />making a decision on whether to change the scope of services, He said they still have to <br />tour the Annex. He suggested they attend the next meeting to answer questions of the <br />committee. Mr. Wagner does not believe a complete wholesale re-Iocation of <br />departments is part of the current scope of services. <br /> <br />Mr. Montplaisir said the committee needs to decide whether the west addition will be built <br />allowing for space needs through the next 25 years or whether the addition will include a <br />certain amount of square footage with a determination to be made on how to fill the <br />space. <br />