Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commission Minutes-April 21, 2008 3351 <br /> <br />7. STATE MERIT SYSTEM, Proposed administrative code reaardina merit system <br />amendments <br />Bonnie Johnson, County Administrator, said in February the board discussed proposed <br />administrative rules regarding the state merit system as notified by Kathy Hogan, Social <br />Services Director. The chairman asked the issue be reviewed again before the May 5, <br />2008, Social Services Board meeting in which Laurie Sterioti Hammeren from North Dakota <br />Human Resource Management Services (HRMS) will be present. <br /> <br />Mrs. Johnson said Senate Bill 2321, passed into law during the last legislative session, <br />allows counties to opt out of the merit system. She believes the legislative intent was to <br />allow the state and counties to streamline personnel systems. After review of the proposed <br />regulations, questions arose whether the legislative intent is being followed. She said two of <br />the proposed rules were amended by HRMS, but sections were left unchanged regarding <br />annual leave accrual schedules and re-employment following a reduction in force. <br /> <br />Mrs. Johnson said a letter sent to HRMS on February 15, 2008, included a request for an <br />Attorney General's opinion on the issue of "for cause" and "at-will" employment as <br />addressed in the proposed regulations. To her knowledge, a request has not been made <br />for an Attorney General opinion. She believes it would be important to obtain an Attorney <br />General's opinion regarding the intent of the Code of Federal Regulations. She said the <br />county's goals are to create a unified personnel system, reduce pay inequities, and ensure <br />equitable compensation and benefits for all county employees. She said a legislative <br />hearing will be held in June on the amendments. <br /> <br />Mr. Pawluk asked commissioners to review the information presented in advance of the May <br />5th meeting. He believes an imbalance exists with the two systems and believes one unified <br />personnel system with employees administered under the same program is the best option. <br />He feels the county's current system serves employees very well. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner questioned when the administrative rules go into effect. He believes the county <br />needs some level of flexibility during the hiring process for a new Social Services Director. <br />He said inadequacies became apparent when salary ranges for the position were <br />considered through the state merit system versus the county personnel system. Mrs. <br />Johnson said the state salary range for the director is $48,624 to $81,048 per year. The <br />beginning salary using the county scale is $72,485 per year with a maximum of $108,715. <br /> <br />8. VOUCHERS, Approved <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mrs. Sorum moved and Mr. Wagner seconded to approve Voucher No. <br />225,693 through Voucher No. 226,219. On roll call vote, the motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />9. HEAD START BUILDING PURCHASE AGREEMENT; SOCIAL SERVICES FEDERAL <br />REVIEW; BUILDING COMMITTEE MEETING; RISK MANAGEMENT TRAINING; ANNEX <br />AIR HANDLER; GFMEDC SALES TAX, Committee reports <br />Mr. Pawluk asked about the status of the purchase agreement for the former Head Start <br />building. Mr. Burdick said he prepared a draft and has spoken with Lloyd Sampson. Mr. <br />Pawluk asked if Mr. Sampson requested the property be re-zoned. The county auditor said <br />Mr. Sampson plans to submit the necessary paperwork after he receives the purchase <br />