08-13-2007
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2007
>
08-13-2007
>
Minutes
>
08-13-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2007 7:21:53 AM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:47:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commission Minutes-August 13, 2007 3248 <br /> <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Vanyo moved and Mr. Pawluk seconded to reduce the proposed <br />2008 remodeling budget for the Highway Department from $15,000 to <br />$5,000. On roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett arrived at 8:50 AM. <br /> <br />Mrs. Johnson said a light ballast replacement project for the Courthouse is budgeted for <br />2008 and the maintenance employees could assist with the highway department project <br />if Mr. Berndt wishes. <br /> <br />Mr. Berndt budgeted to spend $50,000 each in 2006 and 2007 on concrete work at the <br />maintenance shop. The work was completed in 2007 and with inflation had a cost of <br />$180,000. Mr. Pawluk questioned if $100,000 was approved how it ended up being so <br />much higher. Mr. Berndt replied in a budget of $13 million dollars it is not unusual to be <br />off in an estimate. County road crews completed the base work to keep the costs as <br />economical as possible. The concrete placement was contracted out because it was a <br />larger project than county staff could effectively complete. <br /> <br />Mrs. Sorum asked Mr. Berndt to speak further on Cass County Road 16. Mr. Berndt <br />stated that if the board wished to proceed with Cass 16, he suggested they consider <br />supplemental revenue to fund it. One method would be to levy an additional two mills <br />for five years, which would cover about half of the project costs. He is not <br />recommending it at this time, but indicated funding the Cass 16 project would delay the <br />county overlay program by about two years since approximately $3 million per year is <br />currently spent on overlays to preserve pavements. Mr. Berndt provided a spreadsheet <br />that listed pavements and ages to illustrate how the potential Cass 16 surfacing would <br />affect the overlay program over the next 10 years. It was noted the roads should <br />typically be overlaid every 15 to 20 years. The spreadsheet also indicated a number of <br />roads likely to go beyond 20 years between surfacing. Mr. Wagner said this project has <br />been discussed in the past as safety continues to be an issue and questioned what <br />standards are used in prioritizing roads for construction. If traffic volume is 400 cars per <br />day or it is anticipated the traffic count will grow to that number or above in the near <br />future, those roads would be considered. The Cass 17 project has a higher cost <br />estimate because of intersection work and the need to add turning lanes. Mr. Pawluk <br />feels that roads which will be turned over to the city because of population growth <br />should be turned over sooner than later. <br />MOTION, failed <br />Mr. Pawluk moved and Mr. Bennett seconded to reduce the Cass <br />County 17 project by $300,000 bringing the cost to $2,700,000 and to <br />move the $300,000 to the Cass County 16 project. Discussion: Mrs. <br />Sorum asked Mr. Berndt what would happen with the Cass 17 project <br />if the budget were decreased. The City of Horace has set aside <br />$200,000 for County 17 improvements and to make the project more <br />feasible could be asked to contribute additional funding. Mrs. Sorum <br />stated it is not justifiable to take from one project to do another. Mr. <br />Vanyo said if Mr. Berndt is certain he can make it work it would be one <br />way to get both projects done. On roll call vote, the motion failed with <br />Mr. Bennett and Mr. Pawluk voting "Yes" and Mrs. Sorum, Mr. Vanyo, <br />and Mr. Wagner voting "No". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.