09-15-1997
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
1997
>
09-15-1997
>
Minutes
>
09-15-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2004 2:15:44 PM
Creation date
4/22/2003 9:15:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12. <br /> <br />Commission Minutes--September 15, 1997 1711 <br /> <br />FINAL PLATS DELAYED, Richard 2n.d Subdivision; Kris-Bue Subdivision <br />Michael Domitrovich, Fargo City Planner, was present and submitted a letter by fax before today's <br />meeting regarding Final Plat of Richard 2nd Subdivision, NW¼ of Section 5, Township 138N, Range <br />49W. He suggested delaying the plat at this time and welcomed the opportunity to work with the <br />County Planning Department. The proposed subdivision is located along 52nd Avenue South, which <br />has been identified as a Beltline for the City of Fargo. The property is outside Fargo's extra-territorial <br />zoning authority at this time, however, that authority may be expanded from two miles to four miles <br />with some negotiations over the next months, according to Mr. Domitrovich. <br /> <br />Joel Quanbeck, County Planner, was also present and his comments overall are that the City of <br />Fargo has the ability to address planning and zoning issues, whereas, the County does not review <br />and approve land use. In this case, Stanley Township has the zoning authority. Another issue <br />relates to access, and Mr. Quanbeck would like to work with Fargo on this matter also. <br /> MOTION, passed <br /> Mrs. Quick moved and Mrs. Schneider seconded to delay action on Final <br /> Plat approval of Richard 2nd Subdivision for 30 days. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Concerning the Final Plat of Kris-Bue Subdivision, Mr. Quanbeck said at a township zoning meeting <br />held about one week ago, the township delayed action on this plat. Therefore, he recommended <br />the County Commission delay it also. MOTION, passed <br /> Mrs. Schneider moved and Mrs. Quick seconded to delay action on Final <br /> Plat approval of Kris-Bue Subdivision until further notice by the County <br /> Planner. Motion carried. <br /> <br />COURTHOUSE AND ANNEX, Public telephones <br />Mike Steiner, Data Processing Director, received a letter dated September 15, 1997, from Gerlach <br />Communications, Inc. (GCI) concerning the coin-operated telephones located at the Cass County <br />Courthouse and Annex. He previously received a letter dated August 12, 1997, giving Cass County <br />Government 30 days notice to make other arrangements for pay phone service at these two <br />locations and stating the two pay phones would be removed in 30 days from the date of the August <br />12th letter. The letter stated they had numerous conversations with Mr. Steiner because they felt <br />the revenue from these machines was extremely Iow and they could not afford to continue the <br />service. <br /> <br />State's Attorney, John Goff, said there is a difference in legal opinion on the GCI Site Lease <br />Agreement, which was drafted by GCI. He talked about the term of the agreement and in a response <br />letter dated August 29, 1997, to the GCI letter of August 12th, Mr. Goff said Cass County <br />Government expects GCI to fulfill the terms of the agreement and would consider any early removal <br />of the coin-operated pay phones as a breach of contract. The lease agreement provides that GCI <br />reserves the right to terminate this agreement upon written notice if receipts do not meet production <br />minimum, however, no amount was determined as a production minimum in Paragraph #13. It was <br />left blank. <br /> <br />Today's letter from GCI proposes having Cass County Government pay the line charges on both <br />phones of $43 per month/per phone. Mr. Goff said the county could agree to pay that amount or the <br />county could elect to begin a lawsuit against GCI if they do remove the pay phones. Mr. Steiner said <br />he left a message at GCI offering them a chance to be here today for this discussion, but they were <br />not present for this meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.