Laserfiche WebLink
12. <br /> <br />Commission Minutes--May 20, 1996 1473 <br /> <br />Mr. Goff referred to his May 16th letter and suggested an alternative motion, which would be to <br />use the proceeds from the sale of State's Attorney investigator vehicles as the local share of the <br />grant rather than using funds offered by the Teamster Union Local #116. He is concerned about <br />accepting funds from an outside entity because, as an elected official, he must use independent <br />discretion when investigating and prosecuting criminal offenses in Cass County. <br /> <br />If the local matching dollars were accepted from the Teamster Union, Mrs. Toussaint said the <br />money would go into the County's general fund, not into the State's Attorney budget. Money from <br />the sale of county vehicles would also go directly to the general fund, she said. Mr. Wieland said <br />he does not have a problem with accepting the local matching dollars from the Teamster Union <br />as long as no strings are attached to the money. Mr. Ness said this situation would be similar to <br />the D.A.R.E. program, which receives a number of outside donations, and this has not affected <br />the Sheriff's Department enforcement of State laws. MOTION, passed <br /> Mr. Ness moved and Mr. Wieland seconded to amend the State's <br /> Attorney budget for the total of $18,450; with $14,000 being paid by the <br /> federal government for 1996 and $4,450 being paid by the Teamster <br /> Union Local #116 for employment of an Assistant State's Attorney for <br /> the exclusive use as a domestic violence prosecutor; the attorney <br /> position being contingent upon the grant funds, and any employee <br /> being hired should be made aware of the funding contingencies <br /> associated with the position. On roll call vote, motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> <br />ROAD DEPARTMENT, County Road 20 joint funding <br />Keith Berndt, County Engineer, was present to discuss his memorandum of May 10, 1996, <br />regarding an offer by Can-Am Express trucking company and by Border States Paving, Inc. to <br />fund 50% of the cost of a one-inch overlay on one mile of County Road 20 between Interstate 29 <br />and Can-Am Trucking. The total estimated cost of an overlay is $30,000, and Mr. Berndt supports <br />funding up to 50% of the cost from his department's budget. Also, Mr. Berndt would be <br />comfortable with allowing the one-mile segment to be unposted for spring load restrictions each <br />year with the addition of this overlay to the existing pavement section. <br /> <br />Mr. Wieland said he likes the idea because it will preserve the county road segment and benefit <br />businesses in the area. For the amount of real estate taxes these businesses are paying, he said <br />the county will get their money back. He asked if the project will be let on bids, and Mr. Berndt <br />said it will. Mr. Eckert said he is opposed to the idea because he is concerned about granting <br />exceptions and because he would rather see the county's portion of this project spent in other <br />areas of the county where improvements are badly needed. The other commissioners were in <br />agreement with Mr. Wieland to accept any offers to help pay for road projects. MOTION, passed <br /> Mr. Ness moved and Mr. Wieland seconded to authorize the County <br /> Engineer to contract for a one-inch overlay of County Road 20 from <br /> Interstate 29 east one mile, approval being contingent upon Can-Am <br /> Express, Inc. and Border States Paving, Inc. funding 50% of the project <br /> cost. The overlay is intended to add sufficient structural capacity to <br /> the highway to allow year around axle weights of 20,000, 34,000 and <br /> 48,000 pounds on single, tandem and triple axles respectively, subject <br /> <br /> <br />