Laserfiche WebLink
Comm. Minutes--July 6, 1993 1060 <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />The Division of Parole and Probation has agreed to co-locate the <br />coordinator in the Fargo District Parole Office and to provide office <br />space, phone service, desk, file cabinet and technical assistance to <br />further the program development initially, according to Mr. Hoekstra. <br />A VISTA volunteer has been hired to coordinate and monitor the <br /> <br />program. <br /> <br />Mrs. Toussaint asked how the Community Corrections Advisory Board was <br />formed, and Mr. Hoekstra said they solicited people interested in <br />serving on this board. Mrs. Toussaint asked Mr. Eckert if he was <br />representing the County Commission on this committee. He said he is <br />serving as an individual. <br /> <br />Mr. Eckert said the grant application would be submitted by the County <br />and the County's obligation, in addition to the local matching funds, <br />would be through the County Auditor's Office paying bills. Computer <br />equipment included in the. grant application will become the property <br />of Cass County Government when it is purchased. MOTION, passed <br /> Mr. Eckert moved and Mr. Risher seconded to authorize the <br /> chairman and county auditor to sign a grant application for <br /> a community service and restitution program, with matching <br /> funds to be budgeted in the County Court budget for 1994 in <br /> the amount of $1,400. Discussion: Mr. Ness said he agrees <br /> with the concept of the program but he cannot support this <br /> motion because the county commission had no input and the <br /> matching funds will be budgeted in County Court, but there <br /> is no written letter of support from Cass County Judges. <br /> Mr. Hoekstra said the matching dollars can realistically be <br /> collected through the program operations and can then be <br /> returned to the County to make the program self-supporting. <br /> Mrs. Toussaint expressed concern that the county commission <br /> was not aware of this program before the grant application <br /> was prepared in the county's name. At the call for the <br /> question and upon roll call vote, the motion carried with <br /> Mr. Eckert, Mr. Wieland and Mr. Risher voting "Aye," Mr. <br /> Ness and Mrs. Toussaint opposing. <br /> <br />COUNTY COMMISSION TRAVEL, State's Attorney opinion souRht <br />From the June 7th, 1993, Cass County Commission meeting, Commissioners <br />Risher and Toussaint were instructed to work with Bonnie Johnson on <br />drafting policy concerning mileage reimbursement for commissioners, <br />however, it appears state law already sets forth such a policy. <br />State's Attorney John Golf concurred with the research that was done <br />and said the specific state statute dealing with mileage reimbursement <br />for county commissioners for daily travel between residence and county <br />seat was repealed in 1953. <br /> <br />Mr. Ness thinks that any funds expended by the county for employees <br />to travel to and from work siDce the law was repealed must be paid <br />back. Mr. Eckert said people interpret what constitutes official <br />county business in different ways. Mrs. Toussaint said other Cass <br />County Commissioners do things without charging mileage, and Mr. <br />Eckert can continue to check roads and bridges when called, but the <br />Road Department is Mr. Risher's portfolio. <br /> <br /> <br />