07-03-1990
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
1990
>
07-03-1990
>
Minutes
>
07-03-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2004 2:15:30 PM
Creation date
4/28/2003 4:38:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12. <br /> <br />Comm, Hinutes--July 3, 1990 483 <br /> <br />SALARY PROPOSAL FOR 1991 <br />Hr. Geoff Riches, Personnel Director, said due to a number of <br />employees having not received any salary adjustment in a number of <br />years and consumer price index increasing, he proposes the following: <br /> <br />All eligible employees would receive a "catch up" <br />adjustment of 5% or minimum of existing pay grade, <br />whichever is higher, utilizing the new pay schedule for <br />1991. Adjustments would not permit any employee to exceed <br />the maximum of the range. Employees near the maximum would <br />receive less than a 5% adjustment. <br /> <br />Social Service employee salaries wou'ld be adjusted 5% or <br />minimum of existing pay grade, whichever is higher, so long <br />as the new salary did not exceed the existing State salary <br />range for the respective classifications. <br /> <br /> 3. Employees whose salaries are still beyond the maximum of <br /> the pay schedule for 1991 would not be eligible to receive <br /> an adjustment for 1991. <br /> <br /> 4. Elected officials would also receive a 5% adjustment in <br /> salary or minimum of existing pay grade· <br /> <br /> 5. During 1991, a performance appraisal system will be <br /> developed and recommended for implementation in 1992. Any <br /> future salary adjustments for employees would be based <br /> primarily on performance. <br /> <br />The cost of this proposal would be approximately $365,000 over the <br />Salary Budget for 1991. Mr. Riches recommended consideration of the <br />proposal be contingent on the overall budget for 1991 to be approved <br />later this fall· He included three options: Option 1) no increases <br />for 1991; Option 2) 5% increase for 1991, using the 1990 pay plan; <br />and Option 3) 5% increase for 1991, using the 1991 pay plan. He <br />recommended adopting Option 3, which would provide necessary salary <br />increases and utilize the 1991 pay scale designed to provide more <br />uniform relationships between pay grades. <br /> <br />Mr. Mike Montplaisir, County Accountant, said the exact cost of this <br />proposal will not be determined until the 1991 budget process is <br />underway. After the budget is completed, cuts can be made in <br />salaries or in other areas, if needed. Approving this does not <br />finalize salary increases for next year, but gives each department a <br />guideline to follow when preparing its budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Shannon questioned Mr. Riches on whether the proposal will <br />develop a system using market value as a reference for pay grades. <br />Mr. Riches said salary increases will be based on a combination of <br />market value and performance appraisal, but primarily on an <br />employee's job performance. However, pay ranges wil'! be based on <br /> market value. <br /> MOTION, passed <br /> Mrs. Toussaint moved and Mr. Eckert seconded to tentatively <br /> adopt Option 3 of the proposed salary adjustment contingent <br /> on the overall budget document. On roll call vote, the <br /> motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.