06-05-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Comm. Hinutes--June 5, 1990 472 18. 19. MOTION, passed Mr. Wieland moved and Mr. Sondrall seconded that a residential structure value of $44,800 be levied on the south 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 22 of Berlin Township, as recommended by the Director of Equalization. On roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. John Enderle from Stanley Township, spoke on his property (Lot 19, Block 1 of Riverdale Subdivision). He received notice on April 16, 1990, that his property's assessment was raised from $71,000 to $103,900 by the Stanley Township Board of Equalization. At the Stanley Township Board of Equalization meeting on May 7, 1990, the Board raised the assessment to $155,000. This raise was in violation of NDCC 57-12-09 concerning notice to property owner. Mr. Enderle requested that his assessment be made no higher than $103,900. MOTION, passed Mr. Sondrall moved and Mr. Eckert seconded that Lot 19, Block 1 of Riverdale Subdivision be assessed at $110,600 true and full value. On roll call vote, the motion carried with three members voting "Aye" and Mr. Shannon opposing. EQUALIZATION BOARD, Ad'o29~Ened for !990 There being no further business, the Chairman declared the 1990 Board of Tax Equalization adjourned. The Board reconvened as the Board of County Commissioners. TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY, ~9~Ge requested in_R__egister of~Deeds Mr. Kermit Bye, representing the Title and Escrow Company, requested space in the Register of Deeds office for' a scanner' and computer to be used for obtaining information necessary for an abstractor's plan. Mr. Bye also said that the company will install their own phone line, but would need to use electricity from the Register of Deeds office. Ms. Tammy Marvin, manager of the Title and Escrow Company, said she would also need a table and chair for the equipment to be used. She also requested permission to obtain a duplicate of the microfilm copy of file records, which are on file on vault record in Kansas. Deanna Kensrud, Register of Deeds, said she will provide the space. She also feels that this company should be giver] the same treatment as the Cass County Abstract Com[Jal]y. Discussion fo]lowed regarding some type of reimbursement from the Cass County Abstract Company and the Title and Escrow Company for using office space in the Register of Deeds. Mr. suggested a motion that would authorize the States Attor~ey to work with the Register of Deeds and both abstract compatlles t.o create a document that caf] be referred to in the future. MOTION, passed Mr. Wieland moved and Mr. Eckert seconded to allow authorization for the States Attorney to work with the Register of Deeds and the two abstract companies to create a document regarding reimbursement; authorization to allow the Title and Escrow to copy file records; that the principle use of the Register of