10-09-2014
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
Flood Diversion Board of Authority
>
Agenda
>
2014
>
10-09-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2014 11:42:45 AM
Creation date
11/28/2018 2:35:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />HMG_TO08‐A7_Long.docx 7 <br />c. Project descriptions and available information of completed and currently <br />funded flood risk reduction projects since FFREIS) <br />d. Wetland impacts memo due to project changes <br />e. County and city land use plans <br />f. Updated H&H model <br />VII. CEMETERY ASSESSMENT TEAM SUPPPORT <br /> Work with the Corps‐Sponsor Cemetery Assessment Team to develop two to three <br />mitigation alternatives (if applicable) for each site: <br />1. Identify impacts to each of 11 impacted cemeteries, both under existing conditions <br />and with Project. Identify if the impact severity changes/increases under the <br />“with‐project condition” (does increase in depth, duration, frequency <br />change/increase the impact). <br />2. Include issues/information identified during site‐visits conducted on July 21‐22, <br />2014. <br />3. Identify and screen alternatives for site‐specific mitigation measures for the 11 <br />cemeteries to be impacted by the diversion project. List all mitigation types <br />considered. <br />4. Include the berm alternative evaluations. <br />a. Include alternatives for interior drainage features for a berm/wall alternative. <br />b. Consider use of closure types for access. <br />c. Identify whether there are any land constraints making a berm unfeasible at a <br />particular cemetery. <br />5. Include a high‐level cost estimate for each. The cost estimate should include line <br />items for projected O&M costs with each mitigation alternative in place. <br />6. Consider how access to each site is under existing and “with‐project conditions”. <br />Include a rough cost estimate for mitigating for access. <br />7. The USACE will provide any necessary geotechnical assistance. <br />8. Develop a report that fully documents the efforts and analysis completed in <br />developing a site‐specific mitigation plan, including specific cemetery information. <br />a. Report should include cemetery maps which show land parcel information. This <br />would also show the parcels adjacent to the cemetery which may be needed if <br />a berm is to be constructed. <br />b. Incorporate the previously developed “Cemetery Study – June 2013” as an <br />appendix. <br />VIII. LARGE STRUCTURES DESIGN TEAM SUPPORT <br />1. Provide senior engineer to provide ongoing engineering consultation to the USACE <br />Large Structure Design Team. Participate in weekly meetings and provide status <br />reports to Owner and PMC regarding design of the following structures: Diversion <br />Inlet Structure, Red River Control Structure, and Wild Rice River Control Structure. <br />3. Owner’s Responsibilities <br />Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in Article 2 and in Exhibit B. <br />DR <br />A <br />F <br />T
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.