10-09-2014
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
Flood Diversion Board of Authority
>
Agenda
>
2014
>
10-09-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2014 11:42:45 AM
Creation date
11/28/2018 2:35:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />HMG_TO08‐A7_Long.docx 6 <br />b. Local and Regional Benefits – obtain from Corp’s Regional Economic <br />Development (RED) account or similar source. An IMPLAN model can be <br />used to develop quantitative outputs from updated RED information <br />that can be added and/or subtracted from the costs and benefits output <br />from the Hazus model. <br />c. Cost information for analysis: <br />i. Construction costs (quantitative) <br />ii. Mitigation costs (quantitative) <br />iii. Operation and maintenance costs (quantitative) <br />iv. Social costs (qualitative) <br />d. Benefit information needed for analysis: <br />i. Flood damages/fighting (quantitative) <br />ii. Development (quantitative) <br />iii. Induced economic growth (quantitative) <br />iv. Social (qualitative) <br />e. Analyze the following MN EIS alternatives (if found to meet the purpose and <br />need of the Project): <br />i. Proposed Project <br />ii. Base No Action Alternative (no emergency measures) <br />iii. No Action Alternative (with emergency measures) <br />iv. Distributive Storage (with flood barriers) <br />v. C2 (move the Southern Alignment north 1.5 miles) <br />2. Other Studies and Support: <br />a. Compilation of completed and currently funded flood risk reduction projects <br />since FFREIS) – provide list of project descriptions and available information to <br />DNR. <br />b. Changes in wetland impacts due to Project alignment changes – write memo <br />based on information provided by USACE. <br />c. County and city land use plans (relevant portions) – provide information to <br />DNR. <br />d. Analysis of hydrologic rating curve – provide DNR with updated H&H models <br />that incorporate the most recent project modifications and mitigation <br />measures (H&H 7.1 model update). <br />3. Deliverables <br />a. Model outputs for different flood frequencies for all alternatives found to meet <br />the purpose and need of the Project <br />b. For alternatives modeled, maps of the flood damages/fighting, development <br />and qualitative social outputs displayed geographically indicating North Dakota <br />versus Minnesota and metropolitan versus rural <br />DR <br />A <br />F <br />T
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.