01-21-1986
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
1986
>
01-21-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 2:15:03 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 1:56:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Jim Antonoplos from Willow Creek Subdivision presented a petition signed <br />by 29 property owners in his area opposing the tax exemption. He stated that three of <br />his neighbors have homes for sale, and a tax exemption on new construction would <br />make it even more difficult to sell existing homes in the rural areas. <br />Mr. Mark Vanyo was present for the hearing representing the Fargo- Moorhead <br />Home Builders and the Fargo- Moorhead Board of Realtors encouraging the <br />Commission to approve the exemption in order to promote some of the rural areas <br />where lots have been vacant. He stated that some people who may wish to build a <br />home in the County would build in Fargo instead because Fargo approved the 2 -year <br />tax exemption. <br />Clarence Miller, County Director of Tax Equalization, stated that he could foresee <br />problems in administering the 2 -year tax exemption because many of the townships do <br />not issue building permits and it would be difficult to determine the starting date of <br />construction and the completion date. He stated that in 1985 in the City of Fargo, the <br />mill rate could have been reduced 7 mills if this tax exempt property had been placed <br />on the tax rolls. <br />Floyd Buerkley, Fargo City Assessor, was present and stated that the 2 -year tax <br />exemption is difficult legislation to administrate because the exemption only applies to <br />the first owner /occupant. If the ownership transfers, the exemption does not qualify. <br />Commissioner Stanton felt that implementing such a tax exemption is unfair to <br />people who are paying their taxes. Mr. Wieland reminded the Commission of the three <br />original reasons for passing this legislation, these being: unpaid special assessments, <br />creating a future tax base, and to create jobs. <br />There being no further comments, Mrs. Stanton moved and Mr. Larson <br />seconded that Cass County reject the two -year tax exemption on new construction for <br />rural Cass County. The motion carried on roll call vote with four members voting "Aye <br />Mr. Wieland opposing. <br />The Commission recessed for a meeting of the Cass County Building Authority, <br />and then reconvened as the County Board of Commissioners. <br />Mr. Larson moved and Mrs. Stanton seconded to approve the action of the Cass <br />County Building Authority accepting Change Order G -1 in the amount of $252.00 for <br />removal of trees for the Courthouse south addition project. On roll call vote, the motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Larson moved and Mrs. Stanton seconded that the County Auditor pay the <br />bills for rental of the County Court recording equipment from the Court Recording <br />Equipment line item in the 1986 budget. On roll call vote, the motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.