Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commission Minutes--January 18, 2000 2086 <br /> <br />Mr. Montplaisir referred to a hand-out prepared by Frank Klein, County Director of Tax <br />Equalization, indicating there were 76' exemptions in rural Cass County in 1999, which <br />amounted to a loss in revenue of $17,068. <br /> <br />Mr. Wieland provided some background information on the two-year residential tax exemption <br />in rural Cass County. The County Commission first considered the exemption on new home <br />construction on January 21, 1986, and the exemption was rejected after a public hearing was <br />held. The next time this subject was addressed by the county was in 1995, when the exemption <br />was first adopted, and has been approved each year since that time. Mr. Wieland still favors <br />offering the two-year tax exemption and suggested following the same policy as the City of <br />Fargo, which would include a sliding scale for the amount of the exemption depending upon the <br />value of the house. <br /> <br />Mr. Koenig said the intent of the legislation was to encourage home construction at a time when <br />interest rates were high, and that was accomplished. He thinks the cities of Fargo and West <br />Fargo should consider eliminating the two-year exemption also. <br />MOTION, failed <br />Mr. Wieland moved to adopt a resolution authorizing a $75,000 <br />exemption for new houses constructed in the rural area of Cass <br />County during 2000, using a sliding scale for the amount of the <br />exemption, dependent upon house value, similar to the City of Fargo's <br />sliding scale. Mr. Koenig seconded the motion for discussion <br />purposes. Further discussion: Mr. Meyer believes this exemption <br />encourages leap-frog development in the rural areas, as opposed to <br />a more orderly development in incorporated areas, and the revenue <br />generated by these developments will not cover the county's eventual <br />expenses. At the call for the question and upon roll call vote, the <br />motion failed with four members voting "No" and Mr. Wieland voting <br />in favor of the motion. <br /> <br />12. JAIL TRANSITION TEAM, Budget aooroved <br />Mr. Montplaisir explained the budget of $380,380 for the jail transition team. The budget <br />includes salaries for five employees; consultant fees of Jim Rowenhorst, Kimme & Associates; <br />computer and office equipment; rental of office space in a trailer at the site of the new jail; office <br />supplies; and travel expense. Mr. Montplaisir said this is the first of three budgets that will be <br />presented to the Board over the next two months. <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mrs. Quick moved and Mr. Wieland seconded to approve the Jail <br />Transition Team Budget as presented by the County Auditor, Michael <br />Montplaisir. On roll call vote, motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />13. REGISTER OF DEEDS, Comouter conversion uodate <br />Deanna Kensrud, Register of Deeds, reported that her office reached the goal of eliminating the <br />backlog of recorded documents in the office, with a turn-around time of only 12 days as of today. <br />She said they should be able to maintain a reasonable turn-around time with the new computer <br />system. Commissioners commended Mrs. Kensrud and her staff for doing an outstanding job <br />in attaining that goal. <br />