d. Social Service legis issues
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2004
>
08-16-2004
>
Consent agenda
>
d. Social Service legis issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2004 2:15:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2004 10:25:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />services results in disproportionate resources from county to county. The primary <br />disadvantage of funding of county based child welfare services would be the need for <br />additional dollars. In addition, there may continue to be a lack of appropriate support <br />services such as treatment and/or legal resources to assure minimum standards. <br /> <br />Resolution adopted in 2004 by Cass County <br />Regarding Unfunded Mandates for Child Welfare <br /> <br />2004 Child Welfare Funding We urge the ND Legislature to fund mandated child <br />welfare services at 75% of cost and to allow counties that are unable to assure quality <br />services to decline to be responsible for all or some mandated services. <br /> <br />Unfunded Mandate <br />Indian County Funding - SWAP <br /> <br />Current Structure/History <br /> <br />In 1997, the ND legislature restructured the overall funding relationship for economic <br />assistance (grant benefits/local administrative costs) to clarify roles/responsibility. A <br />critical concern was the potential negative impact on Indian Counties. (Counties that have <br />a dispropotionate number of recipients and limited tax resources because of reservation <br />land). In 1999, follow-up legislation was implemented that assured that disproportionate <br />costs were funded through state general funds or general fund equivalents. The original <br />intent was to fund costs above the average mill levy at 100% but during the last two <br />biennium's, these costs have only been funded at 90% thus eroding the overall funding <br />for these high need counties. <br /> <br />Resolution Adopted in 2004 by Cass County <br />Regarding Indian County funding <br /> <br />2004 Indian County funding Because of significant social needs and limited property <br />tax availability for funding of local services, Cass County Social Services supports the <br />full state/federal funding of Indian county economic assistance programs as originally <br />outlined in the SWAP legislation. <br /> <br />County involvement in eligibility determination of Healthy Steps <br /> <br />Current Structure/History <br /> <br />Eligibility determination of Healthy Steps (a health insurance programs for low/moderate <br />income families) is determined by one staff person in the Department of Human Services <br />except for a pilot project in Cass County. Healthy Steps is in a very basic data base <br />system that does not easily allow numerous staff to be involved in eligibility. Currently, <br />a merged Healthy Steps/Medicaid computer system is being developed that would allow <br />for broader involvement of more staff. Administrative costs for determination of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.