2. Tax Equalizatn Bd reconvened
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2004
>
07-06-2004
>
Regular agenda
>
2. Tax Equalizatn Bd reconvened
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2008 4:35:08 PM
Creation date
6/28/2004 1:42:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Recommendation to Raise Commercial Assessments <br /> <br />As directed, I did examine the commercial assessments in those subdivisions on the south <br />side of 52nd Ave in Stanley Township. I was able to obtain the sizes of the structures and <br />other pertinent information. I inspected the neighborhood and compared the structures on <br />a value per square foot basis. Most of these commercial properties are steel frame <br />warehouse type properties. <br /> <br />It appears that the newly constructed buildings are being valued closer to market and than <br />other properties, causing inequities in the assessment. There may be a number of reasons <br />to explain this situation such as (1) Building permits may have been missed (2) Work <br />may have been performed without permits (3) Land values have increased (4) Costs of <br />construction have increased. In hindsight, it would appear that these properties should <br />have had larger indexing increases and should have been inspected more often. <br />Assessors work under time and budget constraints. The amount of new construction has <br />made it difficult to re-inspect properties. <br /> <br />I did visit with the assessor and township clerk and they both indicated that this area is <br />scheduled for reappraisal for 2005. I felt it necessary to increase some assessments to <br />bring these properties closer in line for 2004. I did a cost calculation with the <br />information that was available. I've attached a spreadsheet showing the relative values <br />per square foot of building area after the proposed change in assessment. The properties <br />affected are those listed that have a value under the Change Com Str column (first arrow). <br />The auditor's office did send a Notice ofIntent to Increase form to the ten (10) affected <br />taxpayers. <br /> <br />Suggested Motion: <br /> <br />"I move that the following commercial structure assessments be increased to the <br />amounts listed below." <br /> <br />Parcel Number <br /> <br />Proposed 2004 Commercial Structure Assessment <br /> <br />64-1472-00040-020 <br />64-1795-00010-000 <br />64-1472-00010-000 <br />64-1797-00080-000 <br />64-0190-00130-000 <br />64-1795-00030-000 <br />64-1472-00040-010 <br />64-1797-00070-000 <br />64-1797-00060-000 <br />64-0190-00110-000 <br /> <br />$219,600 <br />$297,200 <br />$361,800 <br />$192,200 <br />$610,000 <br />$428,500 <br />$631,800 <br />$162,000 <br />$156,300 <br />$438,400 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.