2. Road Dept-budget adjustment
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2008
>
10-06-2008
>
Regular agenda
>
2. Road Dept-budget adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2008 11:45:36 AM
Creation date
9/30/2008 11:45:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Update on County Hie:hwav 17 Costs September 26. 2008 <br /> <br />In May of 2008 the Commission was provided with a budget update based on information <br />available at that time. A decision was made to proceed with each of the projects as <br />recommended by the County Engineer. <br /> <br />The Cass 17 project has exceeded the May projections that were used as a basis for <br />decisions. The current projected revenues from the State Highway Distribution fund are <br />somewhat higher than the figures used in May but not enough to cover increased costs <br />In the following paragraphs I'll discuss why the Cass 17 project has turned out more <br />expensive than earlier estimated. <br /> <br />Highway contracts are typically awarded as unit price contracts. This means the <br />contractors bid the project with unit costs. The contractor's bid and successful contractor <br />(low bidder) are determined by totaling the individual unit prices multiplied by the <br />County's estimated quantities for each line item. The contractor is ultimately paid based <br />on the actual quantities required which typically vary somewhat from the estimated <br />quantities. <br /> <br />The project has had a number of items that have significantly exceeded the original <br />estimated quantities. The design consultant had estimated the various quantities that <br />would be required. It has become apparent that some quantity estimates of the major <br />contract line items were quite low. <br /> <br />The quantity estimates left me in the position of having to significantly exceed estimated <br />quantity amounts in order to achieve good long term quality on the project. There are 80 <br />line items in the project. There have been many variations. I'll outline the largest ones <br />below: <br /> <br />Gravel Base: In addition to starting off with an overly optimistic estimate, difficult soil <br />conditions were encountered. To ensure we achieved a good base under the <br />reconstructed mainline road and widened shoulders, it was necessary to use far more base <br />material than estimated. Slow removal of utilities by Qwest added to the difficulty. The <br />estimated quantity was 32,000 tons. The current projection for a final quantity of base <br />material is about 88,000 tons. At a contract price of $ 14/ton this amounts to $784,000 <br />over the estimate. <br /> <br />Asphalt: The quantity of asphalt required to complete the project is now estimated at <br />about 49,500 tons. The original estimate was 44,812 tons. At $49.45/ton, this amounts <br />to $231,822 over the estimate. This is in spite of the fact that a significant area (11,600 <br />square yards) that was originally estimated in asphalt was ultimately done in concrete. <br />One reason for this increase in quantity was that the original estimate didn't take into <br />account how much asphalt would be required to fill in the ruts in the existing surface <br />prior to overlaying the road. In addition, a street in Horace that was damaged from the <br />increased detour traffic was overlaid. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.