2. Merit system amendments
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2008
>
04-21-2008
>
Regular agenda
>
2. Merit system amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2008 9:17:51 AM
Creation date
4/16/2008 12:22:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Laurie Sterioti Hammeren <br />February 15, 2008 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />5. "Regular status" means a category of employment that <br />applies to an individual employed in a classified <br />position, who was selected for a position on an open, <br />competitive basis and who has successfully completed <br />IRe E six-month or lonqer probationary period. <br /> <br />History: Effective September 1, 1992; amended effective July 1, <br />1995; November 1, 1996~. <br />General Authority: NDCC 54-44.3 <br />Law Implemented: NDCC 54-44.3 <br /> <br />COMMENTS ON SPECIFIC ISSUES <br /> <br />While the scope of the merit system, as defined by these proposed <br />amendments, is the overriding issue, many of the other proposed changes <br />appear to be usurping the powers of county government and delivering <br />unfunded mandates to local jurisdictions. <br /> <br />When we received the first amendments to Article 4-07 from your office, we <br />made immediate calls to various public officials to inquire about the <br />direction these policies were taking and two of the proposed amendments <br />were subsequently withdrawn. We appreciate the quick response on <br />reversing requirements on two new mandates. These mandates would <br />have required local governments to accept transfers of accrued annual <br />leave and accrued sick leave for all new merit system employees hired. <br />Several similar sections have not been changed at the time of this writing, <br />and we will make further comment on those sections as follows: (I, 1/ and <br />III) <br /> <br />I. Please note the proposed amendment for the annual leave section <br />printed directly belowthis paragraph. The new regulations are changing a <br />recommended annual leave schedule to a required leave schedule and <br />removing the option of counties filing their own schedule with the human <br />resource management services which would ensure that all county <br />employees in a given county would be on the same annual leave schedule. <br />If this change were accepted, employees working side by side would have <br />different leave accumulations, which not only causes morale problems but <br />extreme payroll difficulties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.