2. Merit system amendments
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2008
>
04-21-2008
>
Regular agenda
>
2. Merit system amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2008 9:17:51 AM
Creation date
4/16/2008 12:22:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />REDUCTION IN FORCE <br /> <br />4.60 <br /> <br />PAGE 2 OF 3 <br /> <br />4. The department head will submit a proposed plan to the Personnel <br />Overview Committee consistent with the governing principles <br />specifying how work will be reallocated or reorgani zed to meet <br />statutory requirements and satisfy the salary reductions. These <br />recommendations will specify what functions can be eliminated. <br />These recommendations should include specific classifications of <br />positions which could be eliminated or reduced under the <br />reallocation or elimination of work. Analysis of employees for <br />consideration in a reduction in force will be done by classification <br />within each department. <br /> <br />5. If an employee is hired in a time-limited position, a grant-funded <br />position for example, they will not be included in reduction in <br />force analysis. Time-limited employees will also not be eligible <br />for continued employment (RIF process) with the County at the <br />completion of the time-limited positions. <br /> <br />6. An analysis of employees for consideration in a reduction in force <br />will be done by classification wi thin each department using the <br />following guidelines: <br /> <br />a. An analysis of the acquired knowledge, demonstrated skills and <br />versatility of employees compared to the work done and the <br />available funding. Employees lacking the necessary skills and <br />versatility should be considered for reduction. <br /> <br />b. An analysis of the levels of demonstrated documented work <br />performance. Employees having documented consistently low <br />levels of performance should be considered for reductions. <br /> <br />c. A review of the length of service of their employees. The <br />review should list the number of years and months employees <br />have been in the County and the number of years and months an <br />employee has been in the current classification. Employees <br />with the least number of years of service should be considered <br />for reduction. <br /> <br />d. An analysis of the extent of required training needed to <br />train a reassigned employee to full productivity in different <br />positions. Employees requiring substantial retraining should <br />be considered for reductions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.