01. Final plat approval for Matthews Subdivision
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2022
>
10-05-2022
>
Additional Information
>
01. Final plat approval for Matthews Subdivision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2022 12:36:08 PM
Creation date
10/6/2022 12:34:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chronological Order of Events for Matthews Property <br /> 07/02/20—Barrie Jacobson from Warfield Appraisal Group emailed Grace Puppe to confirm the zoning <br /> and building eligibilities left for parcel 64-0000-03130-000 (Robert &Vickie Matthews <br /> property) <br /> Grace Puppe replied that she would need to look into this property further to determine the <br /> eligibility. <br /> 08/11/20—Grace Puppe emailed Jeff Warfield explaining that as the parcels were platted as auditor's <br /> lots they are not considered as platted parcels. Auditor's lots are for taxation purposes and <br /> do not hold building eligibility. <br /> 08/18/20—Barrie Jacobson emailed Grace Puppe checked in on the status of the Robert&Vickie <br /> Matthews property and notified Grace Puppe that the property owner is trying to sell four <br /> 10-acre lots on that property keeping one lot for their home. Barrie asked if that property has <br /> building eligibility for four residential building sites. <br /> 08/19/20—Grace Puppe emailed Barrie Jacobson that if the 40-acre lot is sold as one whole parcel then <br /> the deed restriction would not be an issue. Since there are 4 lots trying to be sold that a deed <br /> restriction would be required of 40 acres less the size of the lot for each development right. <br /> Barrie Jacobson replied asking if the property owner has acquired the deed restriction. Grace <br /> Puppe responded that they had not. <br /> Barrie Jacobson asked Grace Puppe asking about the changes to the 2006 Subdivision <br /> Ordinance updates that included the deed restriction requirement. He had asked how these <br /> minor subdivisions are created and what is required to not need a deed restriction. <br /> Grace Puppe emailed back that since the Matthews property is more than 5 lots,they would <br /> need to be built up to major subdivision requirements with curb and gutter, drainage, water <br /> etc. Major subdivisions do not require a deed restriction.The best option if the property <br /> owner is looking to split up the land and not wanting to deed restrict would be to request the <br /> City of Fargo to annex the property into the city's ET area and plat the parcel through them. <br /> 08/28/20—Robert Matthews submitted an Access Permit Application. <br /> 08/31/20—Brian Busta reviewed the access permit application and noted the requirement that the <br /> access must remain multi-use. <br /> 11/19/20—Auditor's Lot 2 was recorded as Document# 1613170.This is the lot that Bob Matthews built <br /> his house. <br /> 02/08/21—Three additional Auditor's lots (Auditor's Lots 3,4, 5) were recorded as document numbers <br /> 1621777, 1621779, 1621781. <br /> 03/29/21—Grace Puppe mailed a violation letter to Robert &Vickie Matthews stating that the property <br /> split to be used for sale or development does not meet the Cass County Subdivision <br /> Ordinance requirements. <br /> Page I 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.