|
Init.
<br />/
<br />AIA Document B203™ – 2017. Copyright © 2005, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. The “American Institute of Architects,” “AIA,” the AIA Logo, and “AIA Contract Documents” are registered trademarks and may not be used without permission. This document was produced by AIA
<br />software at 12:39:00 ET on 12/22/2021 under Order No.4633161157 which expires on 06/13/2022, is not for resale, is licensed for one-time use only, and may only
<br />be used in accordance with the AIA Contract Documents® Terms of Service. To report copyright violations, e-mail copyright@aia.org.
<br />User Notes: (1265062522)
<br />2
<br />§ 1.1.1 Site(s) to be evaluated:
<br />(Identify the site or sites to be evaluated by the Architect and existing buildings that are a part of the evaluation.)
<br />Existing Cass County Jail site located at 450 34th Street South, Fargo, ND 58103.
<br />§ 1.1.2 The Owner’s Development Objectives:
<br />(Identify the Owner’s program for the Project or otherwise state the Owner’s Development Objectives for the Project
<br />in terms of space requirements, anticipated structures, site features, sustainable objectives, and other relevant
<br />information.)
<br />Population Forecast and design options for expanded inmate capacity at the Cass County Jail.
<br />§ 1.1.3 The Architect shall retain the following consultants:
<br />(List name, discipline, address, and other information.)
<br />Bill Garnos, Jail Consultant – 2204 NE 75th Terrace, Gladstone, MO 64118.
<br />Construction Engineers Inc. – 35 4th Street North, Suite 202, Fargo, ND 58102.
<br />§ 1.1.4 Other Initial Information on which the Architect’s services are based:
<br />(List below other information that will affect the Architect’s performance, such as the Owner’s contractors and
<br />consultants, existing entitlements for land use or construction, existing encumbrances to land use, the Owner’s budget
<br />for the Project, authorized representatives, and Owner confidentiality requirements.)
<br />County provided RFP data – see Exhibit ’C’
<br />§ 1.1.5 The Owner and Architect may rely on the Initial Information. Both parties, however, recognize that the Initial
<br />Information may materially change and, in that event, the Owner and the Architect shall appropriately adjust the
<br />Architect’s services, schedule for the Architect’s services, and the Architect’s compensation.
<br />ARTICLE 2 SITE EVALUATION AND PROJECT FEASIBILITY SERVICES
<br />§ 2.1 The Architect shall manage the Site Evaluation and Project Feasibility Services, research applicable design
<br />criteria, attend Project meetings, communicate with members of the Project team, and report progress to the Owner.
<br />§ 2.2 The Architect shall coordinate its services with those services provided by the Owner and the Owner’s
<br />consultants. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on, and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy, completeness, and
<br />timeliness of, services and information furnished by the Owner and the Owner’s consultants. The Architect shall
<br />provide prompt written notice to the Owner if the Architect becomes aware of any error, omission, or inconsistency in
<br />such services or information.
<br />§ 2.3 The Architect shall prepare, and periodically update, a schedule of Site Evaluation and Project Feasibility
<br />Services that identifies milestone dates for decisions required of the Owner, services furnished by the Architect, and
<br />completion of documentation to be provided by the Architect. The Architect shall coordinate the schedule of Site
<br />Evaluation and Project Feasibility Services with the Owner’s Project schedule.
<br />§ 2.4 The Architect shall submit documents regarding the Site Evaluation and Project Feasibility Services to the
<br />Owner at appropriate intervals for purposes of evaluation and approval by the Owner. The Architect shall be entitled to
<br />rely on approvals received from the Owner to complete the Site Evaluation and Project Feasibility Services.
<br />§ 2.5 The Architect shall prepare a site evaluation and feasibility report based on the Architect’s services selected in
<br />Section 2.6. The report may incorporate written or graphic materials, and shall include:
<br />.1 an executive summary,
<br />.2 documentation of the methodology used to conduct the Architect’s services,
<br />.3 the Owner’s Development Objectives,
<br />.4 relevant facts upon which the report is based,
<br />.5 conclusions and recommendations, and
|