3a. Road Dept contract amendment
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2007
>
05-07-2007
>
Regular agenda
>
3a. Road Dept contract amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2007 10:23:41 AM
Creation date
5/1/2007 10:21:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />County Engineer <br />April 16, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />6. 100 feet o.f right o.f way sho.uld be acquired an each side of the <br />centerline in platted areas except where existing develo.pment <br />makes it impractical. Tho.se areas sho.uld be 10.0 ked at an a case by <br />case basis co.nsidering bath sho.rt and l(}ng tenn requirements. <br />7. The interimpro.ject sho.uld be designed to. fit within the existing <br />right o.f 'way if practical in .un-platted areas with the expectation <br />that future right of way needs will be dedicated at the time o.f <br />platting. <br /> <br />When tbe Co.unty first entered into. a contract with SRF consulting. we were planning an <br />co.mpleting the project in 2007 so it was an a very fast track. Far this reaso.n. I believed <br />we would no.t have the staff time to acquire the right af way necessary in time to allo.w <br />for 2007 co.nstruction so. I included tbat wo.rk an SRF's contract. Now that the praject <br />will be built in 2008, I believe aur county staff'including myself cauld take an much of <br />the right afway acquisitian wo.rk in-house. I dan't in any way intend to suggest that <br />SRF's nat to. exceed pro.pasal amount is unreasanable. I do. believe tbe 2171 haurs <br />estimated to. complete the right of way wark is a reasonable estimate o.f the number of <br />hours required regardless o.fwha do.es it. <br /> <br />SRF~s proposal also. includes subcantracted appraisal services. The propo.sal included <br />using RM Hoef's and Associates at a cost o.f$140AOO. I've asked SRF to solicit other <br />proposals for the right of way appraisals. I understand they have dane so, but I'm not <br />prepared to. make a reco.mmendatian an which appraiser to use as of the time afthis <br />writing. <br /> <br />Summary of design and right of way services estimates: <br />Or~ginal contract with 15 parcels <br />Design 2202 haurs <br />Right of way services 741 hours <br />Appraisal Services <br />Other direct non salary eX,pense <br />To.tal not to. exceed price <br /> <br />Revised praposal with 52 parcels <br />Design 2276 hours <br />Right afway services 2171 hours <br />Appraisal Services <br />Red River Title Services <br />Other direct non salary expense <br />Tatal not to exceed price <br /> <br />$175.362 <br />$68,024 <br />$20,500 <br />$24,260 <br />$288,146 <br /> <br />$183,902 <br />$200,402 <br />$140,400 <br />$13,425 <br />$27,368 <br />$565,497 <br /> <br />By using in-house staff fi)r much of the right of way work, the cost of the appraisals will <br />still go. up from the $20,500 listed above. However, cast of the right of way services <br />should be at or belaw the $68,024 original amowlt above. <br /> <br />I ..w....f.RtC.._l''''.,.JIOl' c,"'..w... C""""'1ICll'C17 ."':lfC__ _ doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.