2. MetroCOG workforce housing study
Laserfiche
>
Public/Website
>
County Commission
>
2006
>
09-18-2006
>
Regular agenda
>
2. MetroCOG workforce housing study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2006 12:15:26 PM
Creation date
9/12/2006 11:59:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />construction instead of the cUrrent 16", and to allow manufactured housing on <br />empty city lots. Also suggested was to emphasize the purchase of cheaper <br />materials similar to Habitat for Humanity. <br /> <br />Some comments focused on older neighborhoods such as restoring sub-divided <br />older homes to single-family dwellings for large families, emphasizing fixing up <br />older homes in "old town" areas and building on empty lots. Fargo's Renaissance <br />Project has been positive. <br /> <br />Education. Communication and Dialogue <br />As stated earlier, discussion focused in two areas. <br /> <br />First is the suggestion to continue open communication among government, buyers <br />and developers. The annual forum should be taken seriously to keep community <br />leaders accountable and this issue moving forward. <br /> <br />The second is the creation of a regional housing center to address the issues <br />identified earlier: increase homebuyer opportunities, address expectations and <br />perceptions of home buyers, provide homebuyer education on credit issues. <br /> <br />Community Acceptance of Workforce Housing. Education and innovation were <br />cited as key components in increasing community acceptance. A social norms <br />campaign was suggested, (e.g. "Workforce housing isn't about Them, it's about <br />Us.") as a way to accomplish "myth-busting". Other suggestions were: a parade <br />of homes, mixed-use housing developments; and pre-planning developments with <br />mixed housing types and prices so people know in advance what will be built. <br /> <br />The Resources strategic initiative did not generate discussion. Two suggestions <br />were a demonstration community land trust and taking a portion of taxes to create <br />a fund to keep homes from going into foreclosure. <br /> <br />* * * * * <br /> <br />The Housing Forum was well received. Numerous written comments were <br />submitted such as: <br /> <br />"Great start! Would love to see these discussion and observations put into <br />practical solutions." <br />"Keep this moment going. Excellent." <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />Linda S, 1)()r1ncilj. i\.I.c.P. <br /> <br />i\ ugllst 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.