Laserfiche WebLink
Land that does <br />not flood with o <br />without the <br />Diversion Project <br />Land already <br />floods, but floo <br />same duration <br />with Diversion <br />Project <br />Land already <br />floods, but floo <br />longer with <br />Diversion Project <br />Land already <br />floods, but floo <br />shorter with Diversion Project <br />Land that would not flood, but no floods (ne flooding) with thDiversion Project <br />When placed on a calendar timeline, <br />total time (days) required for the effects <br />of temporary water storage to be over are <br />similar to the calendar dates when spring <br />planting begins. <br />Determined by Hydrology Data and <br />NDSU modeling <br />Additional time for effects of <br />flooding to be over will increase <br />frequency and magnitude of revenue <br />losses. <br />Determined by Hydrology Data <br />and NDSU modeling <br />These two time periods are very similar in length. The likelihood <br />(probability) of a planting delay will be sensitive to factors affecting those periods. <br />Data from the Study <br />With and Without the Project Comparison <br />Fundamental Factor <br />Calendar During a Flood Situation <br />Calendar for Agricultural Operations <br />Most Frequent Floods <br />Less Frequent & Longer Floods <br />Acres Adversely Affected or Not in Various Flood Scenarios <br />2 <br />Comparing Additional Days of Floodwater Impacts With and Without the Project In Place <br />Driving Economic Effects Key Take Aways <br />Project begins Operation <br />Project begins Operation <br />Time toInundation Upstream Mitigation Area Impacted <br />Dry Down of Upstream Mitigation Area <br />Flood Impacts Gone <br />Regional Planting Start Date <br />Hydrology effects vary by <br />storage area and by flood size <br />Hydrology Effects Identified Fiv Conditions <br />1 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />3