Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commission Minutes--January 3, 2006 3020 <br /> <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mrs. Sorum moved and Mr. Pawluk seconded to authorize signage of the <br />courthouse and annex with the hours that each building is open to the <br />public and stating which items are restricted from those buildings. <br /> <br />Discussion: The board further discussed the hours which the sheriff's <br />office is proposing the doors to the buildings to open and close because <br />not all county employees have access to the building until it is open to <br />the public. Their proposal is to staff the security stations and open the <br />doors at 7:55 instead of 7:45 AM and to close at 5:00 instead of 5:15 PM. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett asked about delaying a decision for two weeks and Mr. <br />Ellingsberg said that is not a problem. Mrs. Johnson said the county <br />department head group is meeting tomorrow morning, and they could <br />perhaps discuss the issues further with the sheriff. <br /> <br />Mr. Vanyo questioned approving a motion at this time without being fully <br />aware of the ultimate restrictions and hours of operation. Mr. Ellingsberg <br />said he will report back to the board on possible changes in the list of <br />restricted items, and he will continue to work with Mrs. Johnson, as <br />buildings and grounds supervisor, on standard signage for the county. <br />Mrs. Johnson said the county does use a standard sign, and she would <br />suggest a stand-alone sign for appearance reasons, rather than <br />attaching something to the front door. <br /> <br />A previous question about security responsibilities in public buildings <br />was addressed to Birch Burdick, State's Attorney. He said he did not <br />find anything specific in state statutes on whether the sheriff or county <br />commission is responsible for those duties and has not researched <br />attorney general opinions. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett asked for a roll call vote, after which the motion carried with <br />Mrs. Sorum, Mr. Bennett and Mr. Pawluk voting "Aye"; Mr. Vanyo and <br />Mr. Wagner opposing. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said he understands there will be other meetings to make some adjustments <br />before a final decision is made by the sheriff's department. <br /> <br />9. ORDINANCE DRAFT, Failed to pass first readina on convertina county position from <br />elective to appointive <br />Mr. Burdick provided background information on the Local Governance Advisory Committee <br />discussion on the topic of elected versus appointed county offices. He prepared two draft <br />ordinances, one that would convert the county recorder from elective to appointive position <br />upon the retirement of the current recorder, or January 1, 2007, whichever occurs first. The <br />second draft ordinance would include converting the county auditor and the county treasurer <br />from elective to appointive positions, effective on the conclusion of the terms of those offices <br />in 2011. He said there may be other options the board would wish to consider. <br />