e. Budget adjustments
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2005
>
12-19-2005
>
Consent agenda
>
e. Budget adjustments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2005 2:04:18 PM
Creation date
12/12/2005 2:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Board of County Commissioners <br />December 9,2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />County Sheriff - Detention Center (Revenues and Expenditures) $30,000 <br />We need to adjust both Prisoner Boarding Revenue and Hourly Salaries by <br />the above amount. The additional revenue is because the use of the <br />Detention Center was higher that anticipated at budget time. The additional <br />salaries are because of an error in budgeting. <br /> <br />Total General Fund Revenue Adjustments <br />Total General Fund Expenditure Adjustments <br /> <br />$90,000 <br />$155,000 <br /> <br />Overall, the General Fund is going to end the year with more in reserves than we had <br />projected when we prepared the 2006 budget. In January, when we have a better <br />handle on our ending balance, we will report to the Commission on the year end <br />results. <br /> <br />County Highway Fund (Revenues) $430,000 <br />(Expenditures) $1,125,000 <br />These are substantial adjustments for the County Highway Department <br />Budget and some explanation is required. The department does a lot of <br />projects and each year the budget is built on what funds are available, how <br />much progress is going to be made on a project in a given year, and how <br />funding for that project is going to flow through the county records. A large <br />part of both the increased revenues and expenditures is the way the County <br />Road 20 funding is flowing through the county records. The project was <br />budgeted with the state paying the contracts and the county simply paying <br />their 20% of the project costs. Instead, Clay County is paying 100% of the <br />project. Cass County is then paying Clay County for 50% of the bridge costs <br />and 100% of the ND share of the approach roadway. The county then bills <br />80% of the county costs on the bridge to the State and 10% to the City of <br />Fargo. The City of Fargo is also billed 50% of the county costs for the <br />approach roadway. The other part of the increased expenses is engineering <br />and right of way costs associated with current and future projects. <br /> <br />The County Highway Department has sufficient cash to operate and some of <br />this is just timing issues related to completion of projects. <br /> <br />States Attorney Asset Forfeiture Fund(Revenues and Expenditures) $7,000 <br />We need to adjust both the revenue and expense line items for the additional <br />revenue taken in for forfeitures and additional expenses of the fund. <br /> <br />Weed Control Fund (Revenues and Expenditures) $50,000 <br />Again in the Weed Fund, we need to adjust both the revenues and <br />expenditure line items. The department did more contract spraying for the <br />state and sold some surplus equipment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.