1a. Jail/Kimme report - Laserfiche WebLink

o The removal of the security glazing in the door in deference to a perforated metal plate would not be recommended unless increased staff exposure to various projectiles is a lesser concern than glass damage. The reason we did not have perforated metal in these cells is that the officer looking into the cell is vulnerable to thrown urine, feces, and other liquids. And, as we've heard, inmates have already thrown feces through the food pass in the door thus validating our concern. Additionally, the officer is vulnerable to spit and being poked in the eye through the perforation when he/she necessarily approaches it closely to see into the cell. Lastly, the perforated door contributes to a noisier environment since all sounds from the cell are immediately transmitted through the perforations to other cells and the dayroom. o With the exception of the glass that seems to have failed under "soft" assault because of what we perceive to be manufacturing deficiencies (refer to the test report previously sent) the glass has basically performed as intended. That is, it precluded escape when under assault with a sharp, heavy weapon (the shelf). Therefore, the prime motivation for changing the glazing detail in the door would seem to be county and staff discomfort with the material superceding previous desires for a more open, remote view of the cells provided by the door as designed. I hope this information is useful in your deliberations with reference to recommendation number 6. As always, we encourage you to contact us if we can be of assistance during this difficult post-occupancy period and at any other time. Very truly yours, Dennis A. Kimme, A.I.A. President Rick Hoganson County Commissioners Sheriff Don Rudnick Jim Rowenhorst David Bostwick Gary Bowker