Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HMG_TO08-A13_Long 7 <br />37-feet at the Fargo gage. Determine what modifications are required for <br />certification of existing levees for Project Red River flow through town stage of <br />37-feet at the Fargo gage. <br />3. Deliverables <br />a. Model outputs for different flood frequencies for all alternatives found to meet <br />the purpose and need of the Project <br />b. For alternatives modeled, maps of the flood damages/fighting, development <br />and qualitative social outputs displayed geographically indicating North Dakota <br />versus Minnesota and metropolitan versus rural <br />c. Project descriptions and available information of completed and currently <br />funded flood risk reduction projects since FFREIS) <br />d. Wetland impacts memo due to project changes <br />e. County and city land use plans <br />f. Updated H&H model <br />g. Technical memorandum summarizing the additional impacts and mitigation for <br />a Project 37-foot stage at the Fargo Red River gage. <br />VII. CEMETERY ASSESSMENT TEAM SUPPPORT <br />Work with the Corps-Sponsor Cemetery Assessment Team to develop two to three <br />mitigation alternatives (if applicable) for each site: <br />1. Identify impacts to each of 11 impacted cemeteries, both under existing conditions <br />and with Project. Identify if the impact severity changes/increases under the <br />“with-project condition” (does increase in depth, duration, frequency <br />change/increase the impact). <br />2. Include issues/information identified during site-visits conducted on July 21-22, <br />2014. <br />3. Identify and screen alternatives for site-specific mitigation measures for the <br />11 cemeteries to be impacted by the diversion project. List all mitigation types <br />considered. <br />4. Include the berm alternative evaluations. <br />a. Include alternatives for interior drainage features for a berm/wall alternative. <br />b. Consider use of closure types for access. <br />c. Identify whether there are any land constraints making a berm unfeasible at a <br />particular cemetery. <br />5. Include a high-level cost estimate for each. The cost estimate should include line <br />items for projected O&M costs with each mitigation alternative in place. <br />6. Consider how access to each site is under existing and “with-project conditions”. <br />Include a rough cost estimate for mitigating for access. <br />7. The USACE will provide any necessary geotechnical assistance. <br />8. Develop a report that fully documents the efforts and analysis completed in <br />developing a site-specific mitigation plan, including specific cemetery information. DRAFT