06-23-2016
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
Flood Diversion Board of Authority
>
Agenda
>
2016
>
06-23-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2016 9:01:12 AM
Creation date
11/28/2018 2:35:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />HMG_TO08-A13_Long 7 <br />37-feet at the Fargo gage. Determine what modifications are required for <br />certification of existing levees for Project Red River flow through town stage of <br />37-feet at the Fargo gage. <br />3. Deliverables <br />a. Model outputs for different flood frequencies for all alternatives found to meet <br />the purpose and need of the Project <br />b. For alternatives modeled, maps of the flood damages/fighting, development <br />and qualitative social outputs displayed geographically indicating North Dakota <br />versus Minnesota and metropolitan versus rural <br />c. Project descriptions and available information of completed and currently <br />funded flood risk reduction projects since FFREIS) <br />d. Wetland impacts memo due to project changes <br />e. County and city land use plans <br />f. Updated H&H model <br />g. Technical memorandum summarizing the additional impacts and mitigation for <br />a Project 37-foot stage at the Fargo Red River gage. <br />VII. CEMETERY ASSESSMENT TEAM SUPPPORT <br />Work with the Corps-Sponsor Cemetery Assessment Team to develop two to three <br />mitigation alternatives (if applicable) for each site: <br />1. Identify impacts to each of 11 impacted cemeteries, both under existing conditions <br />and with Project. Identify if the impact severity changes/increases under the <br />“with-project condition” (does increase in depth, duration, frequency <br />change/increase the impact). <br />2. Include issues/information identified during site-visits conducted on July 21-22, <br />2014. <br />3. Identify and screen alternatives for site-specific mitigation measures for the <br />11 cemeteries to be impacted by the diversion project. List all mitigation types <br />considered. <br />4. Include the berm alternative evaluations. <br />a. Include alternatives for interior drainage features for a berm/wall alternative. <br />b. Consider use of closure types for access. <br />c. Identify whether there are any land constraints making a berm unfeasible at a <br />particular cemetery. <br />5. Include a high-level cost estimate for each. The cost estimate should include line <br />items for projected O&M costs with each mitigation alternative in place. <br />6. Consider how access to each site is under existing and “with-project conditions”. <br />Include a rough cost estimate for mitigating for access. <br />7. The USACE will provide any necessary geotechnical assistance. <br />8. Develop a report that fully documents the efforts and analysis completed in <br />developing a site-specific mitigation plan, including specific cemetery information. DRAFT
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.