06-23-2016
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
Flood Diversion Board of Authority
>
Agenda
>
2016
>
06-23-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2016 9:01:12 AM
Creation date
11/28/2018 2:35:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />HMG_TO08-A13_Long 6 <br />b. Local and Regional Benefits – obtain from Corp’s Regional Economic <br />Development (RED) account or similar source. An IMPLAN model can be used <br />to develop quantitative outputs from updated RED information that can be <br />added and/or subtracted from the costs and benefits output from the Hazus <br />model. <br />c. Cost information for analysis: <br />i. Construction costs (quantitative) <br />ii. Mitigation costs (quantitative) <br />iii. Operation and maintenance costs (quantitative) <br />iv. Social costs (qualitative) <br />d. Benefit information needed for analysis: <br />i. Flood damages/fighting (quantitative) <br />ii. Development (quantitative) <br />iii. Induced economic growth (quantitative) <br />iv. Social (qualitative) <br />e. Analyze the following MN EIS alternatives (if found to meet the purpose and <br />need of the Project): <br />i. Proposed Project <br />ii. Base No Action Alternative (no emergency measures) <br />iii. No Action Alternative (with emergency measures) <br />iv. Distributive Storage (with flood barriers) <br />v. C2 (move the Southern Alignment north 1.5 miles) <br />2. Other Studies and Support: <br />a. Compilation of completed and currently funded flood risk reduction projects <br />since FFREIS) – provide list of project descriptions and available information to <br />DNR. <br />b. Changes in wetland impacts due to Project alignment changes – write memo <br />based on information provided by USACE. <br />c. County and city land use plans (relevant portions) – provide information to <br />DNR. <br />d. Analysis of hydrologic rating curve – provide DNR with updated H&H models <br />that incorporate the most recent project modifications and mitigation <br />measures (H&H 7.1 model update). <br />e. Analysis of 37-feet stage through town - For Fargo ND, Moorhead MN, Cass <br />County ND, and Clay County MN review existing infrastructure and document <br />impacts that would occur and require mitigated if the Project Red River flow <br />through town stage were increased from 35-feet to 37-feet at the Fargo gage. <br />Include in the evaluation: pump dependency time, county road closures and <br />isolated properties, protecting/maintaining sewer systems between 35-feet <br />and 37-feet, number of basements impacted between 35-feet and 37-feet, and <br />impacts to Cass and Clay Counties in rural areas. Determine the additional <br />length of levees required for Project Red River flow through town stage of DRAFT
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.