Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III. Identify channel avulsion using LiDAR, and develop preliminary hypothesis about <br />possible triggers. <br />IV. Calculate meandering planform statistics for different reaches of the Red River of the <br />North, Rush, Lower Rush, Maple, and Sheyenne Rivers and compare bankfull geometry <br />and streamwise slope for bracketing of the proposed planform and cross section <br />configuration of the LFC. <br />V. Develop RVR Meander models for selected reaches of the Red River of the North, Rush, <br />Lower Rush, Maple, and Sheyenne Rivers to obtain calibration parameters for <br />evaluation of the proposed planform and cross section configuration of the LFC. <br />VI. Quantify the ultimate meander amplitude of the proposed planform configuration of <br />the LFC using RVR Meander in probabilistic fashion to account for the observed <br />variability in hydrologic conditions and soil properties. <br />VII. Provide most optimal, alternative planform and cross section configuration of the LFC <br />that minimizes meandering adjustments in both the short- and long-term. Evaluate <br />need for lateral and vertical erosion control features in the LFC or the main diversion <br />channel. <br />VIII. Assess impact of different scenarios for commissioning of diversion works on short-term <br />LFC meandering adjustments using RVR meander in deterministic fashion. <br />IX. Develop a summary of significant O&M activities for the West Fargo Diversion and <br />Horace to West Fargo Diversion Channels. This will include a map for every year since <br />the Diversion channels were constructed, including items such as quantities and lengths <br />of sediment removal, riprap, structure installations or modifications, or surveys. <br />X. Provide technical assistance and review to USACE on sediment transport analysis and <br />Geomorphology Study. <br />The following data and definitions will be provided by USACE or Owner: <br />I. The resistance to erosion and shear strength properties of the soils along the LFC, <br />including ongoing laboratory tests of soil erodibility at Texas A&M, as well as more <br />recent geotechnical field investigations conducted along the LFC and main diversion <br />channel. <br />II. The proposed LFC dimensions (cross sections, slope) and planform configuration. <br />III. Design flow discharges for the LFC, including updates on the hydrology of frequent <br />events. <br />IV. Proposed vegetation coverage at the bottom of the main diversion channel. <br />V. Report prepared by WEST Consultants (“Geomorphology Study of the Fargo, ND & <br />Moorhead, MN Flood Risk Management Project”), including electronic files containing <br />historical data compiled and new data collected. <br />VI. Most likely scenarios for commissioning of diversion works. <br />Prepare a first Draft Technical Memorandum: <br />I. Summarize key findings during initial site visit. <br />II. Describe field investigations along successive point bars in meander loops; include <br />laboratory results of carbon dating, if available. <br />III. Identify channel avulsion areas, and of other geomorphic features (e.g., oxbows) <br />characterizing river dynamics over long spatial and time scales. <br />HMG_TO08-A10_Long.docx 2 <br />DR <br />A <br />F <br />T