Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This is Task Order No. 8, Amendment 910, <br />consisting of 14 pages. <br />Houston-Moore Group, LLC Task Order No. 8, Amendment 910 <br />Work-In-Kind (WIK) <br />In accordance with Paragraph 1.01 of the Agreement between Fargo-Moorhead Flood Diversion Authority <br />(“Owner”) and Houston-Moore Group, LLC (HMG) (“Engineer”) for Professional Services – Task Order Edition, <br />dated March 8, 2012 ("Agreement"), Owner and Engineer agree as follows: <br />The parties agree that in the event of a conflict between prior versions of this Task Order No. 8 and this <br />Amendment, the terms and conditions in this Amendment shall prevail, provided however, nothing herein shall <br />preclude ENGINEER from invoicing for work authorized under prior versions of this Task Order and performed prior <br />to effective date of this Amendment, even to the extent such prior work was revised by this Amendment. All other <br />terms and conditions shall remain the same and are hereby ratified and affirmed by the parties. <br />1. Specific Project Data <br />A. Title: Work-In-Kind (WIK) <br />B. Description: This task order will include requests by USACE for the Local Sponsor (Diversion <br />Authority) to provide WIK services related to the Project. <br />C. Background: As allowed by the Federal process, USACE is allowed to request the Diversion <br />Authority provide services as WIK for services that USACE would normally do, but that the <br />Diversion Authority has resources or particular expertise to perform. <br />2. Services of Engineer <br />A. MEANDER BELT WIDTH ANALYSES: <br />Background: Meander Belt Width Analysis was begun under a separate contract. This scope <br />expands upon the work completed under the separate contract. <br />Develop a Technical Memorandum (TM) that provides estimates of the probability of non- <br />exceedance for different meander belt widths given design flows and channel geometry of the <br />Low Flow Channel (LFC), variability and uncertainty in the erodibility and shear strength of the <br />soils along the LFC, and most likely scenarios for the sequence of diversion works commissioning. <br />Develop for the following six (6) reaches: <br />I. Diversion outlet upstream to Rush River inlet <br />II. Rush River inlet upstream to Lower Rush River inlet <br />III. Lower Rush River inlet upstream to Maple River aqueduct <br />IV. Maple River aqueduct upstream to Drain 14 inlet <br />V. Drain 14 inlet upstream to Drain 21C inlet <br />VI. Drain 21C inlet upstream to Sheyenne River aqueduct <br />Conduct the following tasks: <br />I. Site visit of Red River and tributaries. <br />II. Conduct geoprobe drilling, sediment coring, and carbon dating at transects along <br />successive point bars in meander loops at the Red River of the North, Sheyenne River, <br />and Rush River (upstream of channelized reaches) to determine channel migration rates <br />over geologic time scale. <br />HMG_TO08-A10_Long.docx 1 <br />DR <br />A <br />F <br />T