03-19-2012 Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

with the EA document. Q:\14400\14417\14417-1 01\Proposals\14417-1 01_Phase II Environmental Proposai_02022012.xls Maple-Steele Joint Water Resource District Environmental Assessment Proposed Upper Maple River Dam Figure 1.3-1. Potentially Affected Areas N Proposed Dam and Levee -MopleRiver V\DtercoLn• '<lobttand December 2011 100·yr Floodplain: Potential Affected Area l2'.a 100 yoar Floodplain -Area A· Exisbng Impoundment (noompacb) -Area B • Propoaed lmpoundmer< (Catchment Buln) Cass County T142N R54W Figure 4: Potentially affected areas Proposed Upper Maple River Dam Environmental Assessment N A 2 --i:::::::::iMiles Page 8 CASS CDlJNIY GOVERNMENT North Cass Water Resource District Michael R. Buringrud Chainnan Gardner, North Dakota Robert Thompson Manager Page, North Dakota Wesley Ecker Manager Grandin, North Dakota Carol Harbeke Lewis Secretary-Treasurer 1201 Main Avenue West West Fargo, ND 58078-1301 701-298-2381 FAX 701-298-2397 wrd({vcasscountynd.gov www .casscountynd. gov December 6, 2011 Darrell Vanyo Chairman Cass County Flood Sales Tax Committee P.O. Box 2806 Fargo, NO 58108-2806 Dear Chairman Vanyo: RECEIVED DEC 7 2011 CASS COUNTY COMMJSSJON RE: Containment of overland flooding from breakouts of the Elm River in Bell Township The North Cass Water Resource District is looking into a project to contain overland flooding from the Elm River in Bell Township. The project consists of extending Drain #55 through Sections 19 and 20 in Bell Township. This would prevent the Elm River from breaking out and washing out township roads, which serve as school and mail routes and are needed for access and emergency services. At this this time, the Water Resource District respectfully requests the consideration of the Cass County Flood Sales Tax Committee to fund the local cost of the project. A copy of the Drain #55 assessment district is enclosed for your information. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Thank you. Sincerely, NORTH CASS WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT d,/~~~#~' Carol Harbeke Lewis Secretary-Treasurer Worden, Heather From: Lewis, Carol Sent: To: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:04PM Worden, Heather Subject: RE: North Cass WRD-Elm River/Bell Township Project Heather, No, the Board is just in the early stages of discussion on the project. At the February 1, 2012, meeting, the North Cass WRD authorized Moore Engineering, Inc. to analyze Drain #55 and develop a cost estimate to extend and improve the channel. I haven't seen anything back from Moore yet. Carol From: Worden, Heather Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:01 PM To: Lewis, Carol Subject: North Cass WRD -Elm River/Bell Township Project Carol, I am reviewing the list of sales tax project requests. Your letter dated December 6, 2011, from North Cass WRD for the above project does not include the project cost and the local share cost. Do you have these figures available? Heather Worden, Administrative Assistant Cass County Commission 211 9th Street South PO Box 2806 Fargo ND 58108-2806 (701) 241-5609 wordenh@casscountynd.gov 1 February 24, 2012 Keith Berndt, P.E. Cass County P.O. Box 2806 Fargo, ND 58108-2806 City of Mapleton P 0 Box 9-651 2nd Street, Mapleton, ND 58059 701-282-6992 phone 701-282-0080 fax city. mapletonnd@midconetwork.com www .mapletonnd.com RE: Storm Sewer Lift Station Improvements Mapleton, North Dakota Dear Mr. Berndt: RECEIVED FEB 2 c 20121 CASS COUNTY COMMISSION The city is respectively requesting funding assistance from the Cass County Flood Risk Reduction funds for a new storm sewer lift station to improve the operation of our levee system and prevent flooding of Cass County Highway 11. We have attached the Preliminary Engineering Report which explains the project history, need and proposed financing. Please read through the report so you understand the importance of the project not only for the city, but also for the county. The City of Mapleton was just awarded a Community Development Block Grant of $172,492 through Lake Agassiz Regional Council on February 17, 2012. Please see the enclosed award letter from LARC. This is a large step in the right direction, but we still need additional funding assistance to fund the project. The city is tentatively requesting $77,508 from the Cass County Flood Risk Reduction funds, or approximately 23.5% of the total estimated project cost of $330,000. We are currently working with Jason Benson on the additional $40,000 we are requesting from the Cass County Highway Department. We understand that those highway funds may only be available if the county receives favorable bids this spring. For that reason, the city is also requesting an additional $40,000 from the Flood Risk Reduction funds contingent upon if the highway funds do not become available. If the city is able to secure both of these funds, we will be able to construct the new lift station this summer, which will greatly help us fight future floods. Due to the timing of environmental clearance required by the CDBG funds, the project cannot be awarded until June. This should give adequate time to determine if those those highway funds will be available or not prior to awarding the project. Please contact myself or our City Engineer, Brandon Oye, if you have any questions about the project. Sincerely, CITY)·M::Lff(O~.~ _,l"'' Mark Anderson Mayor Enclosures Cc: Brandon Oye-Moore Engineering, Inc. Jason Benson-Cass County Highway Department PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT STORM SEWER LIFT STATION MAPLETON, NORTH DAKOTA REPORT PREPARATION Brandon Oye, PE Moore Engineering, Inc. 925 1oth Avenue East West Fargo, ND 58078 Office: 701-282-4692 Email: boye@mooreengineeringinc.com DATE Revised January 24, 2012 CONDITION OF EXISTING FACILITY In 2009 the City of Mapleton and Cass County reconstructed a segment of Cass County Highway 11 (county highway), which runs through the City of Mapleton from Carl Olsen Street north to the BNSF tracks. Along with the new county highway, a new storm sewer system was installed. The new storm sewer system collects all storm flow off of the county highway as well as some storm flow from the east and west sides of the road which then discharges into the Maple River through a 36" diameter pipe. The storm sewer system includes a sluice gate closure structure on the northwest corner of the county highway and First Street in line with the 36" diameter storm sewer outlet pipe. The closure structure was installed at the levee, which protects the City of Mapleton from the Maple River during floods. This closure structure is designed to be closed to prevent water from backing up into the city during periods when the Maple River is at flood stage. DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEMS During periods of flooding, the closure structure needs to be shut, but the City has no permanent pumps to remove internal storm water from within the levee. This requires the City to set up temporary pumps to discharge the storm water around the sluice gate. The temporary pumps that they use are sometimes unable to keep up with the storm water flow. The amount of flow is dependent on rate of melting snow in the spring and intensity of rain events. There has been several times when storm water has started to flood the county highway because the temporary pumps have not been able to keep up with the internal drainage. This can cause the county highway to be impassable at times Q:\16200\16292\Financiai\Cass County\2012 Mapleton PER.doc Page 1 of4 depending on the depth of flooding in the road. The design life of the new county highway is reduced whenever water floods the road due to water saturating the subgrade and aggregate base. When the subgrade and aggregate base become saturated with water, the strength of the road is reduced causing it to be susceptible to early failure. In addition to the potential damage to the road, the City has to use valuable resources and time to operate the temporary pumps during floods. The pumps need to be constantly monitored and refilled with fuel. These resources could be used in other areas of town during flood operations. The City has future plans to extend the storm sewer system to the east along First Street when it is reconstructed in the near future. The size of the 36" diameter storm sewer outlet piping is designed to handle the additional flows. When the City does expand the storm sewer system, the temporary pumps at the closure structure will need to handle more storm water flow and will be relied on more more heavily to protect the county highway and the City from internal flooding. A permanent storm sewer lift station was included in the original design for the county highway storm sewer system, but was removed due to city budget constraints. The original county highway project was completed under budget, so the city is looking to provide a permanent solution to the problem with the remaining funds they have on hand. DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVES AND SCOPE OF WORK OF THE PROPOSED ACTMTY 1. Do Nothing -The city can continue to manually operate temporary pumps during floods as they currently do, but operating issues will remain. As the City of Mapleton develops, the pumping capacity problem will continue to grow and cause additional issues. The do nothing alternative is not recommended due to the increased frequency of floods the city has seen in the last decade. This will be an issue the city will need to deal with on a yearly basis, with spring floods and sporadic summer floods. 2. Purchase Larger Temporary Pump-This option would solve the issue of capacity, but not the issue of manual operation by city staff. By purchasing a larger temporary pump, the City would be able to prevent storm water from flooding the county highway and the City. This alternative still requires the City to manually place the pumps into the closure structure and operate them during floods. This is not desirable due to the fact that large rain events could come suddenly in the middle of the night during flooding periods with the closure structure is shut. The City's resources and time should be utilized more efficiently during flooding operations. A larger pump would provide some relief from the problem, but it is not recommended alternative. Q:\16200\16292\Financiai\Cass County\2012 Mapleton PER.doc Page 2 of4 3. Install Storm Sewer Lift Station -This option will consist of installing a storm sewer lift station just northeast of the existing sluice gate closure structure. It will include installing an underground 1 O'x1 0' concrete wet well with two 5,000 gpm axial flow pumps. The piping that will be installed include a short section of 36" diameter inflow pipe that will collect the flow from inside the closure structure, and two 18" force mains that will discharge the flow from the pumps to the wet side of the closure structure which will then discharge to the Maple River. To allow adequate access to the lift station, a concrete access pad will be installed from the county highway to the lift station. DETAILED COST ESTIMATES See attached Cost Estimate MAP ILLUSTRATING PROPOSED LOCATION See attached Maps 1. Aerial 2. Proposed Plan LONG-TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED FACILITY INCLUDING FUTURE 0 & M COSTS The City has a public works superintendent who will be responsible for operating and maintaining the storm sewer lift station. The storm sewer lift station will require the same maintenance and yearly inspections as the other storm sewer lift stations throughout the City of Mapleton. The operation and maintenance will be low since the lift station will only be used during flooding events when the closure structure is closed. The public works superintendent is responsible to the City Council, who oversees the financial aspects of maintaining the total system. PROJECT FINANCING The City's share for this project will be financed with city funds on hand remaining from the Cass County Highway 11 Reconstruction project. The Cass County Highway Department also has funds remaining from the county highway project that could be used towards this project. The City is currently working with the highway department to secure those funds. Lastly, the City was awarded a Q:\16200\16292\Financiai\Cass County\2012 Mapleton PER.doc Page 3 of4 community development block grant of $172,492 from Lake Agassiz Regional Council on February 17, 2012. The proposed funding breakdown is shown in the table below: Funding Source City of Mapleton Cass County Highway Cass County Flood Funds CDBG Total Amount $40,000 $40,000 $77,508 $172.492 $330,000 Percent 12.1% 12.1% 23.5% 52.3% 100.0% Without the additional financial assistance from the Cass County Flood Risk Reduction Funds, the city will not be able to pay for the project without creating additional financial burden on the citizens of Mapleton. Q:\16200\16292\Financiai\Cass County\2012 Mapleton PER.doc Page 4 of4 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2012-1 STORM SEWER LIFT STATION MAPLETON, NO Engineer's Preliminary Cost Estimate ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE Lift Station -Underground Structure L.Sum 1 $80,000.00 Lift Station -Pump & 30 HP Motor Each 2 $35,000.00 Lift Station -Electrical L.Sum 1 $35,000.00 Core Structure Each 2 $2,000.00 Storm Sewer Forcemain -18" L.F. 75 $85.00 Subgrade Preparation S.Y. 225 $2.00 Reinforcement Fabric S.Y. 225 $2.00 Aggregate Base Course -6" C.Y. 40 $35.00 Concrete Pavement -6" Reinforced S.Y. 225 $60.00 Turf Establishment L.Sum 1 $3,000.00 Stormwater Management L.Sum 1 $2,000.00 Material Testing L.Sum 1 $2,000.00 Total Construction Funding Administration Design Engineering Construction Inspection Construction Administration Legal Publishing Soil Borings CDBG Administation Contingencies TOTAL PROJECT Proposed Funding Breakdown Community Development Block Grant Cass County Flood Risk Reduction Funds Cass County Highway Department City of Mapleton Total Q:\16200\16292\Financia~Cass County\2012 Est of Cost Page1of1 Project #: 16292 2/24/2012 TOTAL $80,000.00 $70,000.00 $35,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,375.00 $450.00 $450.00 $1,400.00 $13,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $218,175.00 $15,000.00 $29,550.00 $12,300.00 $10,850.00 $3,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $15,000.00 $22,625.00 $330,000.00 Total Share $172,492.00 $77,508.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $330,000.00 STORM SEWER LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS MAPLETON, NORTH DAKOTA er..ted By. CAC Date Savad: 02/18/2012 Data Printed: 11/18/2011 Allrlallmage: 2010 County SIDS ElllvaUan Data: Hortzontal Dahlm: NAD 1983 Statef'lana Ncxth Dakota South FIPS 3302 Feet Vertical Oab.lm: NAV01988 T:\Nu~ un Statlon.mxd moore engineering, inc. N -ST ss February 20, 2012 Mark Anderson City of Mapleton PO Box 9 Mapleton, ND 58059 Dear Mayor Anderson, • Cass County • Ransom County • Richland County • Sargent County •Steele County • Trail County I am pleased to inform you that the Lake Agassiz Regional Council Board of Directors voted on February 17, 2012 to recommend funding for the City of Mapleton's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) storm sewer lift station project. The board has recommended funding in the amount of $172,492 to assist with construction costs. As advised in the pre-application notice, $15,000 will be requested for project administration of this project. The next step is preparation of the full application and submittal to the North Dakota Division of Community Services. We assume you wish to go forward, but request that you provide us with written confirmation of your intentions no later than March 16, 2._012. You may take the first step in the full application process by passing a resolution of sponsorship at your March Council meeting. This will help expedite the process. I have attached the resolution for your convenience. Please return this resolution along with your written confirmation. Please don't hesitate to call with any questions. We look forward to wo"rking with you on your project. Sincerely, .-~u,.~,·.C ~--··.···. .· :. .-. ·.. ' . ·. ~ . . ' . . . ' ' . : . ; ' . :' . • . • -~ • . • • ! Amber Schaan CDBG Program Manager www.la keag ass i z. com felephunt-(70 J) 235 I l 97 • rox (?01) 235 MU6 • TDD (8liU) 3M ntlo9 Lok(. Ago sot/Dev.,J,,prnent Grc1up • LAf.C 1S on cqu"l op~·nrtunrty pru,,Ju crnple;yer Ofld Jt,,der • ll'\(ol 1 R~>g1ono! F'lcmninu <'\ Developmtrlf • B~J~!JH~')J Loon Pr~)qfi..Jnl .. • Hu:.1n(::ss lncubntc~r • Srnol: Bus1nes~ Asststar1:e • I !ou~tr1u D~-·~·elllf mPnt Subject: Flood Risk Reduction Projects RECEIVED NOV 21 2011J CASS COUNTY COMMISSION 1. Project Description: Upper Swan Creek channel improvements 2. Point of Contact: Harvey Morken, Casselton township supervisor 799-2811 or Chad Engels, Moore Engineering 499-5810 3. Estimated total project cost: $3,400,000.00 4. Amount of County funding requested for project: 100%. We have talked to the water resource district and on December 5th, we will be talking to the city of Casselton, but, we are not expecting any available financing for several years. Even partial funding of the $3,400,000.00 would allow work on part of the area that would reduce breakouts and road damage. 6. Who will own and be responsible for maintenance of the project: The Maple River and Rush River joint water resource district. 7. Other information: I will send a copy of the General Layout from Moore Engineering. Since 1993 spring time flooding in the upper Swan Creek area causes the creek to break out of its channel in Section 18 of Casselton Township. These break outs cause uncontrolled water flow downstream and severe damage to township roads. This uncontrolled flow and the road damage create a severe public safety hazard for local residents, volunteer first responders, ambulance and fire personnel; who many times have to respond on moonless nights in far less than clear visibility. The township has been working with the water resource district to solve this, but, the money to do the improvement may not be available for several years as the district just finished a flood control project through the city of Casselton. Any help you can give us with this project would be greatly appreciated and may save the life of a resident or volunteer. Harvey Morken, Chairman Casselton Township f) t1Wt.d.l, /I.A ~ .....,_,~.. .. ~ '1 ll-1-/11 .J ........ 4«• 4."r ;&4_.~~~~ ~~· ~~.1 XI~Y~£~ Upper Swan Creek Channel Improvements Maple River-Rush River Joint Water Resource District Cass County, North Dakota Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Federal Project Extent Channel Improvement • With Croaalngs 15848-200 Oc1ober 7, 2011 [ I ITEM =:I UNIT I QUANTITY I UNITPRICE I TOTAL 1--NDSWC FIJ_NDING_§QURCES COUNTY LOCAL Section Ur1e C~ssinqs f!,~Ex-_-, Cro.-~-inJI-s_ _, _R _ .._ m ove (AU TV~!..~-~~es) ~~ N!>IN Cr<)~si_nq~ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ~o-_ Se_~ Bac:!<fiH ___ _ ~-_ Riprap -All Sizes 5. Ripra!'Fitter Blanket 1-::-_ ~malnino Construction §. _ Exca~Uo_!l -Ch;!n_!lel 1-~PQil i3ll_nk !,ev~ling ~-culvert -J~emC)ve_LAI! Tvpes ~ Siz~~~ !). §heel Pile Drop Struct11re 19 (;~P-18" 11, C!,1_f ,24" Eacll __ Eaf(l _ex _c~y_ S.Y. _ ----~ ______ i ___ s1o.oooQ(l_ __ -~:MJ~ciQQ~----__ m.~OQ .=_-:__::-~@Q:'oo--_ ---~e.ooo.Qo 3~-~=--c~~ s~:'§i ---·-~~:§; _j~~ti~-~~~a ----~~ $734,025.00 $330,311.25 $161,485.50 $242,228.25 C.Y. __ 2_6Q,9Cl()_ _ _ _11_,£5 ~3~5_,0Jl!JcQ()_ __ -----~QQ __ $1Z8J§Q,()()_ Mile __ 7__ $2,500()() _$E,~,_Q()_ $9c6~!JO Lf. 750 _$10.00 F,§QQ.QO ____ _j4~1~.0Q L5_um ___ 1 _____ __ $75,QOO,oo _ _ _ _ S75,QQO.OO ~J.;15Q.OO Lf. __ 80Q____ __ ---~5,0Q_ _ __ $20,000.()Q $11.ooo.OO_ LF. 6()Q_ _ ________ $30.QQ_ _ $_1_11,QQQQQ _ $j!,!JQ(),OO ~-CMf',_3()"_ 1]_. -C~f'_ ' :36" -----1 t.~ ---~-=-------~~: --=$~~~ ----~---~~~~~~ H, f_ll!r<!cj End ~E>C:tjon -1_8" CMP _ 1~. E~ End S!'c;tion : 24" (;MP )§,_ Flared En<! s_e_c:tiQn -M)" C:M.P. _ 1?-fla_n><l_~n_cl~ec;tion-3§"_CM_p 1_1L Flap G_ate_-18" _Sje'1!__ 1!L Flap_§aje-?4" s_~l_ ~Q,_ flap Gal!' -3Q'' $.tee1 ~L F_lap Gale· 36" 5_1~1 ~~c R_iprap' All Siz_es_ a 115800\15848\0plrw;lll f/lfeo.t-158481<1$lt n ~ipf'¥ fitt~r _Blllnk_!!t 2~--RC1CI<_ Check-Tempo@ry 25_. _ Stann Water Manage111ent -~c Material TesUnq 27. Seeding -~_l!gl _16_ _ _____ $15Q.QQ __ _ g~Q()OQO . $1,:lgQ.9Q _____l:ach___ 12 ___________ $2Q()QQ_ _____ _$2,400.00 ___ jq2000 Each 8 _$~.00 __ ~-00 _____ .lt:l:!ll 00 ~a_<;!!_ ---~--$35000 -$1.400.Q() _ Eacll_ 1§ _____ ---~5_Q.OQ _ -~~OQQ.()Q_ $0,0Q _ .. .. ----~~.200.00 ~ach _ _ 1;! __ $:1Q9~()() ~3"6_00_jl() _ jQQ<l _ ~_1_,~11Q._QQ_ ___ j:a_cll_ __ I!__ __ __ HQQQQ _ -~Q.Qll_ _!1,7_t!QQQ Eacll __ 4 _ j500.0Q_ ~:!JlOO.OQ_ _ . ~,()0 ~1, 1()0.00 • __ Q.L_ !lQ.O _______ $60.00 _ _ ~_§_J)Q(.!.OO -----~t§O!lo()() -~00-_RM_OO.OO s_y.___ _ 1,§QQ __ $3.Q() _ _Hc@Q.()Q _____ RI§OOQ $0.QQ ___ g640.00 __ ~ch __ -~---___ j1_.0QQ~09 _____ 5:lcOOO.OO _______ lq~.OQ _____ jQ,_OQ ____ !1_&_5009_ L,Sum _1 ~15_,0QQ.OO_ _ _$15,000.00 ____ . ~.750~00-_ __j_Q.QQ ----~8,2_5_000 Invoice Allowance $2.000.00 $2,000.00 $900.00 $0.00 $1,100.00 -Acre-· -30-----______ _=:g~iJO -522500-:-oo---~i25:oo -so:oo ----m37s--oo ~jL·(~~-~1_0.2§§~ --~O.OQ_._ _$3~11:1?.00 Total Construction _ _$1~725.00 $60LQI!L~~-__ __$1!>1,485.50 _ _______j§I:I,_j63.25 ____ _F'reliminary Engine~ri_n_Q ____ $40,000.00 ____ ---~00 00 ___ -· $4,835.~-___ --~~1~11_ ~~ineerin!!_:_Design & Constructi-"_n _ __Rl_Q.Q()Q.QQ $0 00 ____ $25 388.43 __ }1!!4&11.!;7 ___ f_Of!~!!~ll_c:le__s --~c1.75_.0Q --__ jj_1L79875 ----~?,~!!. .. ___ $112,328.:11 _________ Le9~1_f_ee_-'l __$1 0,QQ(l,QQ ___ $0.0Q_ ____ __!!LOQ_ _ __ $1QLOQO.OO _ _ _ 1\Jninistrative F_~ --·-_ $5,000.00 __ _jQ_()Q_ ____ jQ.QQ_ __ J?.QOQ..QQ_ ~i!l_hl:qf:'lo/8}': Land Acquisition _ $_1Q5_,()00.00_ _ _$0.00 _____ ~QQ _$10_5_,()_0.Q,QO _Engineelin_ll_-~il!hl·oi·W_!y _____ H,5QQ!lQ --------~QQ _____ $0.00 __ ru.QQ..QQ __ l:_~emeni!_~Mo~u_rn~nt~ ___ $15,Q()().QO __ _ _ __ jO.OO _$0Q()_ _ j15,QO(),QQ _ U_tiliti_es: COf1~tructiO!' -~,()()(),()0 ___ m500.0Q_ _ _. -~09-___ _jg?~~OQ _ l:_n~""eri_ll!!_:_U_tiljjj_!S ___ ~5,Q()(),Q9 _$Q(!Q ____ j().OO_ . $l),OQQQO Fiscal $55.000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $55.000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST I $2,100,000.00 I $741,375.00 I $223,357.70 I $1,135,267.30 P.Jof4 ... e !!~122!~~- ITEM _ Section_U~_<;ros~~':l.9~ 1.. .!Ex.. C.. r.o.. s sinq.!.:. R~mo. ve {!\II T~PE>~ & .~g.e.s} .2~ li~ C_rof!'!Lil!!!... _. ~· .~~c;!Ell!cl\fill. 4. ~iprap-All Size~ 5. ~erap Filter Blanket. UNIT ~---~~ -~.r C.Y. SY. 15848-200 October 7, 2011 Upper Swan Creek Channel Improvements Maple River-Rush River Joint Water Resource District Cass County, North Dakota Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Entire Channel Improvement -With Crossings QUANTITY _____ L 5_. MQ!l. __ IS.O_ 1125 UNIT PRICE TOTAL NDSWC FUNDING SOURCES ----co!iNTY ... -r--LOCAL ~~~~~~ :=._$1,~:~ =~---=~~::: r:=.:_~~~::_ ~=~ .~~~~~· -----~1_5.00 ---$125,000.()()_1-----$56,25<!,_()()_ $27,500.00 ____ $41.~50.00 $§000 ____ $45,00Q,QQ. ___ $20,2~.()()_ _ ---~UOO.QQ _ $14,85().00 $3,00 $3 375.00 $1 518.75 $742.50 $1 113.75 $1,223,375.00 $550,518.75 $269,142.50 $403,713.75 Remaining Constructle>n __ ___ _ ______ ... -... E), Ex.«acatiCll]-Qh~llroeL g.Y~ 46Q,QOO . ·--U~ ---~5.0()().()() .. _ _!256,750Jl() .. _SO~Q<l. $:1_1§£5000 ]. _ SJlQil.~nl<_b"Y.eJiDQ. __ Mi~ 11 _____ $2,5QO~OQ _ ---~2LSQQ,OQ U_2,3]!L_OQ. _ ~0.00 $15,125.00 ~-C:.t.dye_rt,R_elllO~J>iAI!_T YQes!~E>.s) u= _1,0llQ_ _ __ J1Q.OO ___ -~1Q,OOO,QQ. _ $4,5()0~QO. __ _j(LQQ -$~sQOOO 9. Sheet PileDrop Structure LSum 2 $75,000.00 $150,000.00 $67,500.00 $0.00 $82,500.00 lQ c:_MP~-18 .. ---I...F-:-1,000 --~~s:-!lQ-.::.s2S.ooooo ___ _j112~09 ~ilQ __ 11i15Qm 1L C:t.4P-~4'' U' _ _L_5()__ $~000 ... ~'l?AiQQ,()() ___ $_10,12?~00_ _____ __10.00 ____ ~17,:3I!Loo_ 1L C:t.AP-.3()'' LE._... !i@_. _ _j~!L_OQ ______ $17.5()().00 $7,875.00 __ $0.00 -------~,625.00 1~ C:.M_F'-_ ~"-LF', _ . 250 .$40.00 _ ---_l1Q~OOO.OO $4,500.00 . $0.00 $5,500.00 t~~i?rE!:~E~E~~~t ---------~J:i~ __ j. --· ::~{:'!----=--=-~-=~==m~ ~-----~--~i~~-=~-~:t~:-1L f_lare_d.!'lli1SectiQ!l-36''CMP ____ _E~<:h__ ?. ~3.5QJlO_ $1.750.00 $~,5Q_ _ _ ___ .1QJ!Q ______ $962~ j!!, fla!>_G~~'-1~:.§1.<><11 _ ____ -~ell__ -~Q _ .l25Q()() ... $5,()00.00 _ .~2.250,QQ .. ~00 ______ $2,750.00 ~· ~~~:~ ~: ~:::. -~:~-i~~ _ · _l sroo~~ · --~~~-__ ~ :~:~~ ______ · _. :~~ ~--:t~~ ?.L l'laP.C3ate-~"§tll!'l Each_ __ _ 5 l5Q9.()() ___ $2,50Q.QQ _ !1,125.0Q. _ ~OQ_ _____ .l.L375.()()_ ~ ==f~!~:~1et_____ _ _ -~~~~: ____ t:--_ ~~~~ ------~~::~ ---$~~:: -------~~ --~_'_1li:l~ ~~. ~c>g<C:.~e<:ts:I~po~_ __Each. 5 _l.1Jl()IUJQ_ ___ . .J§,Q()(),oo __ g~o.oo_ . ______ lQ.OO _ ~p?Q.OQ ~~ :::i~:ti~:nagem~llt .. ~~:~:-~ _ . A)lo~ance $~L~.:_~ ---~~~~~ .. ~$.~~~ ___:_==~-:~~~ 1 . . -=.itf~IL~ 27. ~eedinl! Acre 5() ·-.. __ ....... 175Q.()() $37 500.00 $16 875.00 $0.00 $20 625.00 ---~--~75000 ____ 144~311?-50 ---.. ~f---_$544361_.?Q_ ____ .Iolau::onslfucti<>_n __ $2 213 125.00 __ _l9!l?~1.~ .. __ $26~~Ml $948 076 '1?. __ __ Prehmimuy EJ19inllering ____ $_50~Q<lQ.OO SQJlQ $6 080.60 __ H:3c91 !!~ Engineering -Design & Construction __ l:t.5().QQO,QO _____ ... ___$0 .00 ... . ~~.!i§<!:tjl $307 435~1!1 -~-==--=--=c~nti_nll.~~~ ~-$421 87500 __ . .m~,~375 ___ $51,305.05. $18(),?2!>,29 ______ Legal F11es $10,000.00 ___ __l()JlQ_ _ .. _ .. !.Q,OO __ jJQ'-OQQJlQ. _________ ..... ___ Aministrative t=.ees _ ......... $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 .. _ _i?,Q()(),QO _ __ Right-oH'V"t :.Land~itiQ!l ___ $175 000.00 ___ $0.00. ___ ___ $Q_QQ __ $175 OOO.OQ_ ____ .E1{!i~ri.'ll!-~i9_h!:O.f:V\'S}' ___ _l1Q,Q()().OO ____ _l!!,QQ. __ $0.00 ____ }1_Q.JlQQ.QQ f---Easements & Monuments ~OOOJlQ _____$0 .00 _________$ _Q..!l9 _ . .$~Q.ooo.QQ ----:u]liti~:=consifiiCt;on _ _ __ -$50,ri.QQQQ. _____ m._500.()()_ . $OCIO_ _ _ _m5oo.QO _ _ _ _ Engineerifll!·l)tilities _ ----~Q()()JlQ_ _ _______ SQ.QQ $~LOQ ~,QQO.()() Fiscal $90.000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $90.000.00 TOT AIL PROJECT COST I $3,400,000.00 I $1,208,250.00 I $3&9,092.34 I $1.822.&57 .&6 Q·l15e0011564410f--loiC. -15848.KIP Page 1 of<4 ero22!i~. . -'" Normanna Township November 30, 2011 Board of Cass County Commissioners 211 Ninth Street South Fargo, ND 58108 Board of Cass County Commissioners RECEIVED DEC ... 2 2011. CABS COUNTY COMMJsSioN We are requesting funding assistance on 4 flood related projects within our township. They are as follows: Project 17: Proposal: We are proposing that we move and reconstruct 700' stretch of 167th avenue approximately 20' and 40' to the west, away from the Sheyenne River. Purpose: The need for this project is due to the river eroding away the road to the point that the road is hazardous to use during times of flooding. Cost: Cost on this project is yet to be determined. Attached: Please see attached pictures and maps labeled: P 17-1, P 17-2, P17-3, and Pl7-4. Project 18: Proposal: We are proposing that we add 15' of culvert and embankment on both the east and west end of the culvert traversing I 67th avenue near the intersection of 50th ST. Purpose: The purpose of this project is to improve the safety of using this road during times of flooding. Currently, during Sheyenne flooding, water flowing under this road creates a hazard because the road is too narrow during these events. Cost: Cost on this project is yet to be determined. Attached: Please see attached pictures and maps labeled: P18-1, P18-2, Pl8-3, P18-4, P18-5, and P18-6 Project 19: Proposal: We are proposing that we raise 300' stretch of road ~nnroximatelv 1' on 49th St that is between 166th avenue and 167'". Purpose: The purpose of this project is to continue to allow access for 6 residences during times when the Sheyenne is flooding. The need for this project is due to flood waters backing up from highway 16, and inundating this 300' stretch of road we wouiu like to raise. In the past this has been a problem, but we feel that after the raising of county road 16 with its resurfacing that 49th St will become impassible during times of flooding. Cost: Cost on this project is yet to be determined. Attached: Please see attached pictures and maps labeled: P19-1 and Pl9-2 Proiect 20: P;oposal: We are proposing that we gravel 2 miles of 169th avenue from 52th street to 50th street. This stretch is now a minimum maintenance road. Purpose: The purpose of this project is to provide all weather access for 20 family's during flooding events. In the past we have had to gravel this road during flood events. The results have been less than satisfactory due to the condition of the road when the gravel was applied. If this road could be shaped and graveled when dry we feel the results would be much better. Cost: Cost on this project is yet to be determined. Attached: Please see attached pictures and maps labeled: P20-1 We appreciate your consideration of our proposed projects. The point of contact for these projects should be: Mark Ottis Normanna