1. Jail operations final reprt
Laserfiche
>
Public/Website
>
County Commission
>
2002
>
11-18-2002
>
Regular agenda
>
1. Jail operations final reprt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2004 2:14:00 PM
Creation date
11/13/2002 2:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cass County Jail Project <br /> <br />Observations, Findings, and <br />Recommendations Pursuant to a <br />Post Occupancy Monitoring on <br />October 23-25, 2002 <br /> <br />Introd.:tim <br /> <br />?ost occupancy monitoring refers to the close monitoring of jail operations <br />after moving inmates into the facility. It is the last phase of the transition <br />process that began more than a year before the new Cass CountyJail was <br />completed. <br /> <br />Post occupancy monitoring is the responsibility of both the Jail administration <br />and supervisors and the jail consultant hired to assist in the transition <br />process. The administration and supervisors closely monitor jail operations <br />from the moment inmates are moved into the facility. They must ensure that <br />the staff are performing satisfactorily and that policies, procedures, and post <br />orders are being followed. They must also ensure that operational problems <br />are addressed effectively and quickly. The consultant monitors operations <br />several months after opening to ensure the administration and supervisors <br />have been successful in their efforts. Funding for the post occupancy <br />monitoring is included in the consultant's contract for transition services. <br /> <br />It was anticipated under the consultant's contract that two post occupancy <br />monitoring visits would be made. The first was to occur between three and <br />six months after opening to trouble shoot the administration's effoKrs to fine <br />tune jail operations. The second visit to be conducted one year after opening <br />and was to be a more substantial and structured effort. <br /> <br />Approximately six weeks after inmates were moved into the new facility, the <br />County Board of Commissioners asked for an immediate post occupancy <br />monitoring visit to address a large dollar amount of vandalism in the facility. <br /> <br />Purpose of Post Occupancy Monitoring <br />It is not unusual for new jails to experience problems after opening. Seldom <br />have transition teams been able anticipate and address every operational <br />problem prior to opening of the new facility. And, many jails experience at <br />least some difficulties in implementing the concept of direct supervision. <br /> <br />Typically jails experiencing problems have responded in a piecemeal fashion <br />or have used a "[land-Aid" approach dealing with symptoms rather than the <br />root causes of the problem. Frequently, corrective actions have included the <br />assignment of additional security staff, and/or costly and unnecessary <br />physical plant alterations. Unfortunately, the emergency quick-fix solutions <br /> <br />Cass County Jail Project 1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.