Laserfiche WebLink
Diana Murack requested Commission approval to attend the <br />Minnesota Association of County Administrators meeting in <br />Bloomington, MN on January 31 through February 2, 1988. Mrs. Stanton <br />requested receiving a copy of the agenda for the Commissioners to <br />review for the January 5th meeting. <br />Diana Murack reported that two brass ornaments were stolen from <br />the railings inside the Courthouse. Commissioner Eckert stated that <br />he will help to secure the other ones located throughout the <br />Courthouse, and the States Attorney suggested filing a report with <br />the Fargo Police Department and the Sheriff's Office. <br />Mr. Mark Thelen, Director of Finance for the City of Fargo, <br />appeared at the County's request to explain problems with the City <br />of Fargo tax increment program. He stated that the County Auditor <br />incorrectly calculated the tax levy on the tax increment projects <br />resulting in a shortage of budgeted funds to the City of Fargo and <br />the Fargo School District. He stated that the error has gone unnoticed <br />for the past seven years. <br />County Treasurer Maxine Liversage stated that if the County were <br />to mail tax statements to correct the error in the 1987 tax calculation, <br />it would require mailing 24,000 additional statements and she <br />estimated the cost of the materials alone to be $14,675. Due to the <br />manpower involved in addition to the cost of the materials, she <br />indicated that she would like to see a solution that would not require <br />sending additional tax statements. <br />Mr. Duane Carlson, Assistant Superintendent for the Fargo Public <br />Schools, presented copies of a letter stating that the Fargo Board <br />of Education passed a motion at their December 15, 1987, meeting <br />requesting the County Auditor to revise the 1987 tax statements that <br />were mailed after they believe the error had been discovered. There <br />was some discussion about the time when the error was first found <br />and County officials were notified and when the 1987 statements were <br />mailed. <br />When asked about the County's options in correcting the situation <br />on the tax increments, States Attorney Robert Hoy stated that he has <br />not had sufficient time to completely review the statutes to determine <br />what options are available to the County. Mrs. Stanton requested <br />the States Attorney's opinion, and Mr. Wieland suggested writing <br />letters to all entities involved asking for their formal position <br />on the matter. He also requested that the County Treasurer provide <br />the Commission with a memo identifying all of the costs involved, <br />to the best of her knowledge, and a time frame of the work that would <br />be involved. The next regularly scheduled Commission meeting is <br />January 5th, and Mr. Wieland did not anticipate meeting before that <br />time since Commissioner Sondrall is absent and since the Commission <br />will be gathering as much information as possible in the next 2 -3 <br />weeks. Mr. Thelen stated that the City would appreciate receiving <br />copies of the information that the County is gathering, such as the <br />memo from the Treasurer and the States Attorney's opinion. In <br />closing, Mr. Wieland stated that the County will take the steps <br />