Laserfiche WebLink
II�,�.r►e <br /> NN <br /> T 3 � i S+s <br /> bast fall, my entire neighborhood was being reassessed for property values. I recently received my <br /> revised house assessment from the city. My city assessment was done in the fall of 2013. Approximately, <br /> four months later, I also had a professional appraisal done. Since the city assessment was so much larger <br /> than the professional one, I contacted the city and spoke with Janelle. She told me to send in my <br /> professional appraisal so that it could be determined where the estimates differed. The professional <br /> assessment was $302,000 and the city assessment was $323,000. <br /> About a week later I received a letter from Janelle that only seemed to list more "comparable" sales than <br /> what the professional appraiser used --and that based solely on the square footage selling price -- it <br /> appeared my house was properly assessed. There really was no explanation on why the two assessments <br /> were not more comparable except for including more home sales and homes not even close to my <br /> neighborhood. I find this very "strange" as I specially asked the person from the city who came out to <br /> assess my house if there was a formula based on square footage and then amenities or lack of <br /> amenities such as granite countertops, hardwood floors would increase/decrease the value. I was told <br /> that this was not how the city assessed and it was based upon the house. ( which nobody seems to tell me <br /> what that is) Based upon that letter, it appears my house was assessed by taking the square footage times <br /> the average selling price per square foot . But this does not include/exclude certain house specific <br /> items. The professional appraisal would have taken this items into consideration. <br /> After looking more closely at the letter from Janelle( it is attached) -- I looked up each property and <br /> found the city assessment for each. I added a column to the right of the selling price of each property <br /> with the city assessment of each property. In many cases, the city assessment is LESS than the what the <br /> house sold for. This leads to my confusion. My house, which was NOT for sale, is assessed at a value of <br /> houses that were sold but the houses that WERE sold --are not assessed by the city at the price they were <br /> sold for . This does not seem fair or equitable. <br /> I feel the Rose Creek propety should not be included as it is a completely different part of the town and <br /> the area is completely different than my neighborhood. In looking at this property, the price per square <br /> footage is really different than the other "comparable" sales. If I take the city assessed value and calculate <br /> the"revised" square foot value and exclude the Rose Creek property -- the "revised" value on my house <br /> would be 304, 400 which is more comparable to the professional appraisal without house amenities even <br /> being considered. <br /> I also feel that basing my house value on average square footage selling price is not taking into account <br /> what amenities are included in those other houses and not what is specific to my house. Again, using the <br /> properties that were in the letter from Janelle <br /> 3353 River Drive --- which is directly in my neighborhood has the following amenities: Heated garage, <br /> New Kitchen with granite countertops w/tile backsplash and stainless steel appliances. It has built in <br /> cabinets in the dining room and family room. It has an office and 4 bedrooms. City Assessment: <br /> $299,300 but the sheet says this property was sold for 389,400 --- It has 194 less square feet than <br /> mine but my assessment is $23,700 higher and my house does not have the above upgrades. <br /> 3327 River Drive -- which is in my neighborhood has the following: Six bedrooms, brick on the front of <br /> the house, Hardwood flooring, Jacuzzi...I could not obtain any more information. City assessment: <br /> $298,700. My house has 78 more square fett than this property but is assessed $24,300 higher and <br /> again --- my house does not have these upgrades. <br /> Rose creek Property -- New Carpet, surround sound, Wet bar, "Tile in the kitchen, Add'l kitchen in the <br /> basement, and looked like granite countertops I could not get any other information . This property sold <br /> for only 308,000 but the city appraisal was 341,000 . Again, I do not hae any of these upgrades. <br />