Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />The development of the 2030 MTP continued by preparing new transportation issues, goals and <br />objectives. The new Plan goals and objectives reflect the extensive public input gathered early in <br />the study process. This process is discussed further in Chapter 5 and Chapter 10 of the Plan. <br />This step was important because it helped the community focus on the current system's <br />problems, thereby identifying the needs to be addressed by the future transportation system. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FUTURE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM <br /> <br />Based on earlier assessment work and established plan goals, a future alternative analysis was <br />completed. Chapter 6 of the Plan analyzed future transportation system alternatives by <br />reviewing technical options for 26 roadway or bridge projects, examining traffic options within <br />five special sub areas, identifying useful traditional and non-traditional system management <br />practices, and considering the recommendations of previously adopted modal plans. The results <br />of this effort was presented to Metropolitan COG's Transportation Technical Committee and <br />refined into a specific program of implementable strategies. <br /> <br />REVENUE FORECASTS AND FISCAL CONSTRAINT ANALYSIS <br /> <br />To fulfill the federal requirements that MPO transportation plans be fiscally constrained, it was <br />necessary to forecast revenues prior to the programming of projects. Utilizing funding <br />information provided by local officials and after coordination with Metro COG's most current <br />Transportation Improvement Plan, both short and long-range revenue forecasts were developed <br />for all affected jurisdictions. Using future cost data generated by preliminary project <br />identification, financial constraint was achieved. Further the relationship between operation and <br />maintenance costs, as well as new construction or reconstruction by modal element (roads, <br />transit, bicycle/pedestrian, etc.) was reconciled with anticipated revenue forecasts. This analysis <br />was necessary to assure a sufficient funding stream was maintained for system preservation <br />activities. Chapter 7 of the Plan documents this fiscal analysis. <br /> <br />EVALUATION OF IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES <br /> <br />After the completing the alternative analysis, possible improvement strategies were evaluated <br />utilizing four (4) screening factors. These evaluation factors included: technically sound, <br />environmentally sensitive, financially feasible and socially acceptable. During this evaluation, <br />appropriate local, state and federal regulatory agencies were contacted to solicit their comments <br />on the potential projects, especially concerning environmental issues. Chapter 8 of the Plan <br />explains these efforts and documents the evaluation process. <br /> <br />In turn, after consideration of all public agency input, the TTC established draft short- and long- <br />term project schedules by jurisdiction for inclusion in the draft Plan. This proposed schedule of <br />projects were compared to the Plan's goals and objectives, and established federal planning <br />factors. <br /> <br />Executive Summary - Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan Update <br />Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments <br /> <br />June 2004 <br />Page 4 <br />