07-06-2004
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2004
>
07-06-2004
>
Minutes
>
07-06-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2004 2:15:03 PM
Creation date
7/9/2004 11:08:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commission Minutes--July 6, 2004 <br /> <br />2750 <br /> <br />Mr. Hushka said the Fargo Assessment Department looks at areas each year where the <br />most inequities appear to occur, and this area was recently reappraised. <br />MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Wagner moved and Mr. Vanyo seconded that the assessment at 501 <br />23rd Street South, Fargo, be retained as equalized by the City of Fargo <br />and recommended by the Director of Equalization. On roll call vote, the <br />motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Carolyn Thompson, 806 7th Street North, Fargo, was present for the next appeal, and was <br />represented by her attorney, Carl Elofson. Ms. Thompson feels her assessment increase <br />is too large and unfair because the home is situated on a small lot, there is no alley and no <br />garage. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein said he can appreciate Ms. Thompson's concerns; however, she would need to <br />contact the City of Fargo about the levy of special assessments, and she should contact <br />school administrators and legislators about the school tax. Since assessments of <br />residential property are market based under North Dakota statutes, he concurs with the <br />assessment as equalized by the City of Fargo. He said the taxpayer has not provided any <br />information indicating the assessment exceeds market value. <br /> <br />Mr. Vanyo said he understands how difficult these tax situations are for people on a fixed <br />income. He said the value over the past couple of years may seem high; however, it is <br />possible the property was undervalued for a number of years and it is now catching up with <br />the market. <br /> <br />Mr. Elofson indicated how stressful this has been for his client. He said she had about a <br />$700 increase in one year and may be forced to sell her home if she cannot pay the taxes. <br />He recommended a substantial reduction in the value based on the home being 100 years <br />old, the depreciation and the location. <br /> <br />Mr. Hushka said the property is valued about $19.00 per square foot less than comparable <br />property because the city did consider the drawbacks mentioned by Mr. Elofson. He also <br />feels sympathetic toward Ms. Thompson's situation. In recent discussions he has had with <br />citizens and a legislator, there is enough concern that consideration may be given to <br />switching from property tax to income tax to ease the school tax burden. <br /> <br />Mr. Meyer said he is familiar with the Thompson property, and the lot is very small. The lot <br />is 50' wide and he questioned if the property would sell for the suggested market value. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein recommended that Ms. Thompson appeal to the State Board of Equalization, and <br />that she should present an appraisal, along with any evidence showing the assessment is <br />excessive. Mr. Elofson said another appeal to another level is costly for his client. <br /> <br />Ms. Thompson said she tried to refinance her mortgage to lower the payments and her <br />property was valued at the original purchase price of about $30,000. She purchased the <br />home in 1991, according to Mr. Elofson. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.