Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8. Project Cost: <br /> <br />PROJECT NO. C14 Scenic Tree PlantinQs: I I <br /> I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE I <br />Cass Hwv 81S to Cass Hwv 17S I <br /> SPEC I APPROX. ESTIMATE UNIT <br />ITEM NO, IDESCRIPTION UNIT I QUANTITY COST TOTAL <br />1 103 IDecidous Tree - 1 1/2" or greater Unit I 625 $400.00 $250,000,00 <br /> <br />101M <br /> <br /> <br />9. Enhancement Activity Category: <br /> <br />Category 2: Scenic & Environmental Projects <br />a) scenic highway programs <br />b) landscaping and other scenic beautification <br /> <br />10. Project Relation to Surface Transportation: <br /> <br />Function: The project creates a visual buffer between residential areas along the <br />roadway making it not only a more pleasing road to drive on, but also creating <br />shade, reducing runoff and erosion, and shelter for wildlife. There is also <br />considerable development on this busy road and the road will at some point in the <br />future require expansion. The presence of a well place tree buffer will help to <br />make a future expansion project more acceptable to adjacent developments. <br /> <br />Proximity: The trees will be planted within highway right of way, however at a <br />distance far enough out to allow for expansion of the roadway without having to <br />remove the trees. <br /> <br />Impact: The positive impacts of trees include shade, shelter, environmental, and <br />visual. There are no negative impacts to the roadway associated with this project. <br /> <br />11. Supporting Data <br /> <br />1. Is this project part of an identified tourism, recreation or transportation plan and <br />if so explain? <br />Installation of trees and other landscape elements along the outside <br />edge of the roadway were recommended in a 2002 Corridor Study <br />Report. <br /> <br />2. If your project is part of a plan, explain the background and origin of the plan <br />and attach supporting documentation. <br />The 2002 Cass County Highway 17 Corridor Study was prepared to <br />assist Cass County in planning for both short and long term needs for <br />the corridor as development pressures had increased due to the <br />growth of Fargo, West Fargo, and Horace. (see attachment 1 which is <br />an executive summary of the study) <br /> <br />3 <br />