Laserfiche WebLink
<br />AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO BASINWIDE FLOOD CONTROL: <br />THE EVALUATION OF THE W AFFLE@ CONCEPT <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />The following summary describes a multiyear study to evaluate the feasibility of <br />employing a basinwide, distributed, temporary storage strategy as a means of augmenting <br />existing dikes and controlling the devastating effects of springtime flooding in the Red <br />River ofthe North Basin (RRB). With funding provided by the U.S. Department of <br />Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and input and guidance <br />from two advisory boards, the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) <br />evaluated the feasibility of utilizing a basinwide system for temporary storage of <br />floodwater in the RRB. The flood mitigation approach, referred to as the Waffle concept, <br />could be accomplished by temporary storage of springtime runoff in existing <br />"depressions" within the basin, primarily ditches and low-relief fields bounded by <br />existing roads. The storage areas, roads, and existing drainage systems could act as a <br />distributed network of channels and control structures for the temporary storage and <br />controlled release of the retained water to reduce peak flood crests along the Red River <br />and its tributaries. <br /> <br />In order to evaluate the efficacy of the Waffle concept, it was necessary to 1) <br />determine if sufficient storage capacity is present in the RRB to provide significant <br />mitigation of major springtime floods; 2) develop a comprehensive combined <br />hydraulic/hydrologic model of the Red River drainage basin to evaluate the flood <br />mitigation benefits of Waffle storage during floods of various magnitude; 3) evaluate the <br />impacts of temporary Waffle storage on downstream flood reduction and on the <br />landscape through multiple field trials; 4) examine the economic feasibility ofthe Waffle <br />concept to mitigate large springtime floods, including the costs of implementation, <br />administration, and maintenance, as well as the benefits of mitigating flood damages; and <br />5) evaluate stakeholder receptivity to the concept. <br /> <br />Simulated effects of the Waffle vary widely over the RRB and with different <br />event scenarios. For one 1997 flood scenario, the largest simulated reduction in peak <br />flood stage (as much as 6.2 feet) occurred in Fargo, North Dakota, and the least reduction <br />(as little as 0.2 feet) occurred in Wahpeton, North Dakota. Numerous field trials <br />conducted over the course of the study verified the effectiveness of the concept for flood <br />mitigation and suggested that the Waffle approach can reduce overall flood volumes <br />through increased evaporation and infiltration, increase soil moisture, and supplement <br />groundwater reserves without adversely affecting the environment. The predicted flood <br />mitigation benefits for several larger communities along the Red River as well as the <br />estimated cost of implementing the Waffle were used to determine the net economic <br />benefit of the concept. The estimated net benefit of Waffle implementation over the next <br />50 years was on the order of hundreds of millions of dollars, with some implementation <br />scenarios exceeding $800 million in benefits. While the economic benefits of the Waffle <br />estimated herein are alone sufficient to warrant evaluation of implementation options, <br />