2. Merit system amendments
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2008
>
04-21-2008
>
Regular agenda
>
2. Merit system amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2008 9:17:51 AM
Creation date
4/16/2008 12:22:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Laurie Sterioti Hammeren <br />February 15, 2008 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />This section, however, has been amended and now reads, "Retaining <br />employees on the basis of the adequacy of their performance, correcting <br />inadequate performance, and separating employees whose inadequate <br />performance cannot be corrected." Based on this change in the federal <br />regulations, of which I have attached a copy noted as Exhibit B, Cass <br />County wishes to challenge the proposed rules and their processes as <br />outlined. <br /> <br />Prior to the passage of SB 2321 , conversations of record exist between our <br />two agencies which reflect a difference of opinion on the interpretation of <br />the federal regulations as noted in Exhibit B, which "recognizes fully the <br />rights, powers, and responsibilities of state and local governments and <br />encourages innovation and allows for diversity among state and local <br />governments in the design, execution, and management of their systems of <br />personnel administration, as provided by that Act." (Section 900.601 (a)) <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION <br /> <br />The Cass County Board of Commissioners would like to resolve this issue <br />for the long term and would ask that your agency seek an Attorney <br />General's opinion regarding this question. That conclusion will allow our <br />county to decide, once and for all, whether using the "opt out" provisions <br />established by state law will enable us to create one uniform compensation <br />system. <br /> <br />AT-WILL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Our county policy manual has been reviewed on several occasions by three <br />different legal firms in Fargo. Based on their advice, Cass County policy <br />has never had a "probationary period". This eliminates any employee from <br />believing that once you have completed your "job probation" that you have <br />become a "permanent employee" and have a property interest in your job. <br />Absent a separate employment contract, guaranteeing job security, all <br />employment is presumed to be at-will, permitting the employer to discharge <br />the employee for any reason, so long as no statute is violated. The only <br />employee in Cass County Government who has a contract for employment <br />is our Social Service Director, based on the existing merit system status. <br /> <br />In North Dakota, teachers generally enter into contracts with their school <br />boards which in turn create a property right in their jobs. Government <br />employees generally do not have contracts and no property rights to their <br />jobs. In North Dakota, when Workforce Safety and Insurance (formerly <br />Workers' Compensation Bureau) dropped out of the state merit system in <br />1995, they became and still remain "at-will" employees. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.