2b. Harwood bike & pedestrian path-comment letter
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2008
>
01-22-2008
>
Regular agenda
>
2b. Harwood bike & pedestrian path-comment letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2008 7:58:01 AM
Creation date
1/16/2008 7:45:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Harwood Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Study - 2007 <br /> <br />Environmental Justice: <br />This project might have some short term negative impacts due to dust, noise, vibration <br />and delay in commuting across the overpass during the time of construction but it should <br />be noted that the project will result in positive benefits to the bike and pedestrian facility <br />users. Most of the construction for the project will use the right of way owned by the <br />county and will not affect any private property. The construction will not have <br />disproportionate negative affects on any minority or low income neighborhood. <br /> <br />Conceptual Figure: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />;;;1 <br />E <br />~ <br />l <br />0'" <br />\ 100W'aIt: <br />ri- <br /> <br />~\ <br /> <br />12' Widened deck or Cantilever includes 2' Jmey Banier <br />8' Shoulder <br /> <br />Intentate Ovapass <br /> <br />24' Roadway <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I \ , <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />Figure 4.41: Proposed Bridge deck widening at 1-29 Overpass <br /> <br />Alternative 4 addresses the needs 2.21, 2.22 and 2.23, but does not meet the cost <br />effective and short term project criteria. <br /> <br />4.5 Alternative 5 <br /> <br />The recommendation of this alternative is: <br /> <br />i. To construct a stand alone bicycle and pedestrian bridge. <br /> <br />a. North of the existing interstate bridge (suggested connection between <br />Ash Lane and Lind Boulevard) or, <br /> <br />b. South of the existing interstate bridge (suggested connection between I <br />57th St N and Freedland Dr) <br />I <br /> <br />Fargo - Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments <br /> <br />- 16 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.