e. Abatement applications
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2008
>
01-22-2008
>
Consent agenda
>
e. Abatement applications
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2008 7:57:47 AM
Creation date
1/15/2008 4:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />INVESTIGATION OF ABATEMENT APPLICATION <br /> <br />ABATEMENT NO. 4304 <br /> <br />Following is a report on the investigation of the abatement application of: Cory & Renee Clasen <br /> <br />County Board of Commissioners and State Tax Commissioner: <br /> <br />The applicants are asking that the valuation be reduced from $600,000 to $530,000 for the year <br />2006 on their residence located at 406 118th Ave S, Stanley Twp. They've submitted a recent <br />appraisal indicating a value of $530,000. The original preconstruction financing appraisal dated <br />January, 2005 indicated a value of $545,000. Both appraisals included an additional 2.5 acre <br />tract of land. The applicants also submitted a construction cost summary from the contractor <br />indicating a cost of about $525,000 excluding the land. The appraisals indicated a value of <br />$90,000-$100,000 for the lot and additional acreage. <br /> <br />The Stanley Twp Board recommended denial of the abatement application. Although no reasons <br />were stated, it appears that there may have been various conflicts of interest, and the matter was <br />simply deferred to the county for an independent determination. <br /> <br />I did inspect the property and reviewed the appraisals that were submitted. Ms. Hopson, the <br />Stanley Twp Assessor and I discussed sales in the metropolitan area. We also reviewed other <br />factors that affected values and reviewed additional information that was not available when the <br />assessment was performed. The assessment of the property was complicated due to the unique <br />nature of the land and improvements and the lack of sales with similar characteristics. <br /> <br />After reviewing these additional factors, both Ms. Hopson and I concur that the assessment <br />should be set at $550,000. I did speak with the applicant and he agrees that it is reasonable <br />assessment. Although not at issue in this application, the applicant also feels that the 2007 <br />assessment should also be set at $550,000. It appears to be a reasonable request. <br /> <br />Suggested Motion: "I move that the Abatement #4304 be reduced to $550,000, as <br />recommended by the Director of Equalization, in concurance with the local assessor and <br />accepted by the applicant." <br /> <br />Dated January 10th, 2008 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ XY-u-J <br /> <br />Frank Klein <br />Director of Tax Equalization <br /> <br />j :Itaxlwplabate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.