Laserfiche WebLink
RECEIVED <br /> <br /> DEC 1 9 200 <br /> <br />CASS GOUNTY GOMMI&SION <br /> <br />INVESTIGATION OF ABATEMENT APPLICATION <br /> <br />ABATEMENT NO. 4239 <br /> <br />Following is a report on the investigation of the abatement application off Wayne and Virginia <br />Miller <br /> <br />Cass County Board of Commissioners and State Tax Commissioner: <br /> <br />The applicant is asking that the valuation be reduced on his property located at 498 25th St S, <br />Fargo. Mr. Miller is asking for a reduction from $86,000 to $55,000 for 2003. The applicant <br />states that the value is too high for a "run down property" and a change of use from commercial <br />to residential. He also states that the purchase price was $100,000 on 6/30/2003. Mr. Miller <br />states that $20,000 of personal property was involved in the purchase price (see abatement). <br /> <br />The City of Fargo recommended denial of the abatement (city assessor report attached). <br /> <br />On November 20, 2003, I visited with Mr. Miller and inspected the property. The office building <br />is located at the comer of 25th St and 5th Av S. The one story wood frame structure was built in <br />1955 as a residence and has a gross area of 845 square feet. In 1994, it was remodeled and <br />converted to office use. On the date of inspection, the office was empty and was being updated. <br />Mr. Miller indicated that the ceiling was recently redone, a new furnace was installed and new <br />carpeting would be installed. The property is currently advertised for rent as commercial <br />property. <br /> <br />The Miller's recently purchased the property, along with the personal property and insurance <br />business assets. The purchase agreement states that they paid $100,000 for the real estate and <br />$25,000 for the personal property (see purchase agreement on file with commission secretary). <br />Mr. Miller stated that the personal property had little value. Mr. Miller also stated that the <br />valuation is excessive and that it's inequitable with neighboring residential property. <br /> <br />I reviewed the assessor information and it appears that the property was reassessed in 2002 for <br />the 2003 assessment using a cost approach to value. The assessor has also provided an income <br />analysis in support of their value. <br /> <br />I did review the assessments in the neighborhood. The layout of the block is somewhat unusual. <br />The lots run straight through from 25th St, which is commercial in nature, to 24th St, which is <br />residential in nature. The west portion of the lots are commercial in nature and the east portion <br />are residential. The neighborhood is in transition with new commercial construction and <br />remodeling along 25th Street. For 2004, all residential property north of 5th Av, south of Main <br />Av, east of 25th St to 18th St were reassessed and equalized. It would appear that any residential <br />property that was under assessed has now been reassessed. <br /> <br /> <br />