Laserfiche WebLink
December 5, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Sheriff Block Grant Fund <br />Grant Funds 13,374 <br />Equipment 11,512 <br /> Additional grants received and utilized. <br />Jail Commissary Fund <br />Taxable Sales 122,000 <br />Merchandise to sell, other costs 148,000 <br /> This is a self supporting fund, the jail purchases merchandise to sell to the prisoners and uses the 'profit' <br /> <br /> to fund inmate recreation items. <br />Document Preservation Fund <br />Fee Income <br />Refund <br />Share of fee paid to NDRIN <br /> <br />50,000 <br />17,200 <br /> <br />33,400 <br /> <br /> Total Document Preservation Fund 67,200 33,400 <br /> The Document Preservation fee is put in this fund, as the fees rise, the amount paid to NDRIN also <br /> increases. Part of the fee income is a refund from NDRIN reserves. <br />Debt Service Funds <br />Assessments 5,740 <br />Fiscal Charges 2,300 <br /> The Debt Service Funds are all in connection with Special Assessment Districts. <br />Capital Projects Funds <br />Estate Tax 260,000 <br />Sales Tax 3,050,000 <br />Architect/Engineering Fees 67,000 <br />Construction 69,700 <br />Transfer to General Fund 950,000 <br />Furniture & Fixtures 15,000 <br /> Total Capital Projects Funds 3,310,000 1,101,700 <br />The capital projects expenditures relate to both the removal of the old jail and some remaining items in <br />the new jail. The transfer to the General Fund was for added jail salaries in 2003 - we had budgeted for <br />the revenue to the General Fund but neglected to formally include the transfer out of the construction <br />fund. <br />911 Funds <br />In the 2003 and 2004 budget, we show the Land Line Fund and the Wireless Funds separately <br />because, for a time we had to keep, the wireless fee separate. I recommend that we combine these <br />two budgets for 2003 and 2004. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />MiChael Montplaisir, CPA <br />County Auditor <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION: <br />Move to approve the 2003 and 2004 budget adjustments, as outlined by the County Auditor in a letter <br />dated December 5, 2003. <br /> <br /> <br />