Laserfiche WebLink
Pedigree Building (Unit 100) 4776 28 Ave S, Unit 100 <br />Parcel Number: 01-8150-00200-010 Owner: Urban Holdings, LLP <br />Information provided above is a summary of the analysis conducted. Full analysis is provided in the Assessment Department’s work file. <br /> <br /> <br />Appeal of Assessment for Year: 2023 <br /> <br /> Name of Applicant: Patrick Vesey <br />Assessed Value(s) 2023 3,581,600 +12% <br /> 2022 3,191,800 <br /> <br />Applicants Requested Value(s) N/A N/A <br /> <br />General Property Information <br />Property Type Office (Condominium) <br />Year Built 2006 <br />Net Area (Deeded) 14,485 sf 247.26 / sf <br />Gross Area (w/ Allocated Common) 20,097 sf 178.24 / sf <br />Land Area (Allocated) 59,340 sf 9.99 / sf <br /> <br />City of Fargo Recommended Value 3,327,000 -7% <br /> <br />Summary <br />Appellant has not specified an indicated market value. <br /> <br />Subject is part of a two story office building that has condominium declarations. Subject is Unit #1, the largest of the three declared units. <br />All units in the building are under the same ownership. The subject has functional obsolescence due to an oversized common area. The <br />common area is technically allocated to all three units. The building was originally constructed for medical office use. Wide hallways, and a <br />large atrium reception area are included in the floor plan. The common area represents 28% of the gross building area. We studied <br />comparable sales and found the typical common area to be between 1% and 16%. The current configuration restricts leasing space and <br />increases expenses for the tenants (or owner). <br /> <br />We handled the obsolescence by using the sales comparison approach to value. We treated all three units as one economic unit and found <br />comparable sales commensurate in size and age. We then used net leasable area as the primary unit of comparison. We applied the <br />reconciled price per square foot of net leasable space to the combined economic unit. Finally, we allocated the value to each unit based on <br />their deeded ownership interest. The final value indication was $3,327,000. <br /> <br /> <br />Comparable Sales Summary <br /> <br />Property Type Size Size <br />(Net) <br />Size <br />(Gross) <br />Year <br />Built <br />Sale <br />Date <br />Sale Price <br />(with SPUN) <br />Sale Price <br />(Adjusted) <br />Price $/SF <br />(Net) <br />Price $/SF <br />(Gross) <br />Office 4150 19 Ave S 26,610 31,543 2016 06/2022 8,579,700 7,193,939 270.35 228.07 <br />Office 1655 43 St S 26,020 31,144 2014 03/2020 5,384,900 5,600,983 215.26 179.84 <br />Office 3633 Lincoln St S 20,168 20,372 2015 04/2022 4,841,000 4,511,778 223.71 221.47 <br />Office 4166 31 Ave S 14,334 15,489 2006 11/2021 2,261,100 3,002,289 209.45 193.83 <br />Subject 4776 28 Ave S 14,485 20,097 2006 3,327,000 229.69 165.75 <br /> <br />Competing Properties (Assessed Values) Summary <br /> <br />We studied current assessments of similar properties for equalization. The <br />search parameters are all office parcels in the “Interstate Southwest” map zone, <br />built between 1996 and 2016, measuring between 10,000 and 50,000 sf. <br /> <br />The 2023 true and full value sits above the 50th and near the 75th percentiles in <br />value per square foot (net deeded) and improvement value only respectively. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Value /SF Value /SF <br />Impr Only <br />Maximum 391 312 <br />90th Percentile 278 217 <br />75th Percentile 245 183 <br />Median 206 161 <br />25th Percentile 185 137 <br />10th Percentile 160 113 <br />Minimum 145 98 <br /> Subject 229.69 188.75 <br />