Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> CASS COUNTY ROADWAY 18 EXTENSION STUDY – CASS COUNTY, <br />ND <br /> <br />1 <br />1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />The Cass County Highway Department, in coordination with both the Normanna and Pleasant Township <br />officials, made a request to the Fargo-Moorhead Metro Council of Governments to study the potential <br />extension of Cass County Roadway 18 along 52nd Street SE. The study area for this project includes 52nd <br />Street SE in Cass County from Cass County Roadway 17 west to Cass County Roadway 15 in both the <br />Normanna and Pleasant Townships within Cass County, North Dakota. <br />The existing conditions analysis of the study area identified existing utilities, land uses, and environmental <br />features. The existing conditions analysis also reviewed the roadway typical sections for 52nd Street SE <br />and County Roadway 18 and the Sheyenne River crossing bridge. The 2018 traffic volumes for 52nd <br />Street SE ranged from 155 to 200 vehicles per day with approximately 20 to 25 percent heavy vehicles. <br />There were six crashes from 2013 to 2017 on 52nd Street SE with one fatal crash. <br />The future conditions developed forecasted traffic volumes on 52nd Street SE for the years 2025 and 2040 <br />for a no-build, aggregate and paved roadway surface alternatives. The 2025 forecasted traffic forecasts <br />ranged from 175 to 230 vehicles per day for the no-build alternatives, 190 to 245 vehicles per day for the <br />aggregate surface alternative, and 220 to 300 vehicles per day for the paved surface alternative. The <br />2045 forecasted traffic forecasts ranged from 220 to 280 vehicles per day for the no-build alternatives, <br />245 to 300 vehicles per day for the aggregate surface alternative, and 280 to 325 vehicles per day for the <br />paved surface alternative. No impacts to the study area are expected due to the proposed Fargo- <br />Moorhead diversion. <br />The project purpose is to study the feasibility of extending CR 18 from CR 17 to CR 15 and transitioning <br />ownership to a county roadway and the roadway typical section to meet county roadway standards. The <br />goals associated with this project are as follows: <br /> Study the county roadway network connection for CR 18 between CR 17 and CR 15 to maintain a <br />roadway network that allows users to travel on a standard roadway cross-section to Kindred and <br />between CR 15 and Interstate 29. <br /> Provide recommendations/alternatives for a roadway that maintains a suitable driving surface <br />throughout the year and accommodates traffic mix consisting of passenger cars, heavy trucks, and <br />agriculture implements. <br /> Provide recommendations/alternatives that will minimize the potential for crashes along the corridor. <br /> Support the goals and objectives of the Cass County Transportation and Comprehensive Plan <br />The project needs include the following: <br /> County roadway system connectivity <br /> Insufficient roadway surface conditions due to subgrade <br /> To minimize the potential for crashes along the corridor <br /> To support the goals and objectives of the Cass County Transportation and Comprehensive Plan <br />Throughout the duration of the project, a Study Review Committee periodically met to discuss the findings <br />of the project and to review and provide comments on the Study’s memoranda. A public input meeting <br />was held on December 4th, 2018 at the Kindred High School commons area. Comments were received at <br />the meeting and for two weeks after the public meeting. <br />The final analysis of the alternatives included three alignments on the existing alignment (no-build, <br />existing alignment with County typical section, and relocation of the church) and three alignments <br />adjusting the location of the Sheyenne River crossing bridge (alignments A, B, C). The Study Review <br />Committee was tasked with only ranking the Sheyenne River crossing alternatives. The criteria used in <br />analyzing the Sheyenne River crossing alternatives was developed and approved by the Study Review <br />Committee and was provided to the committee for their ranking of the Sheyenne River crossing <br />alternatives. The results of the Committee’s rankings were alignment B followed by alignment C and <br />finally alignment A.