4. Tax Equalization Board reconvenes
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2007
>
06-18-2007
>
Regular agenda
>
4. Tax Equalization Board reconvenes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2008 4:12:39 PM
Creation date
6/13/2007 8:22:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2007 Cass County Board of Equalization <br /> <br />Steven Stavenes Report <br /> <br />Steven Stavenes, at 406 Woodland Place NW, Reed Twp is appealing the assessment on <br />his new resi~ence. The Reed Twp assessor assessed the property at $278,000 and the <br />local board upheld that assessment. Mr. Stavenes submitted an appraisal that indicated a <br />value of $247,000. He also forwarded a purchase agreement stating a price of $231 ,000. <br />The warranty deed indicates the full consideration at $280,000. <br /> <br />I inspected the property on May 29th, 2007 and vistied with Mr. Stavenes. The residence <br />is a good quality bilevel with an attached 3 stall garage. The upper level living area <br />contains about 1,786 sq ft and the lower level contains about 1,503 sq ft. Both levels are <br />completely finished. It would appear that Mr. Stavenes provided "sweat equity" when <br />the home was constructed. <br /> <br />I also reviewed the appraisal report. In addition to the sales listed in the report, the <br />recorders office indicates that the adjacent property sold recently for $245,000. <br />According to the assessor, the structure is a 1,576 sq ft rambler with no basement. It has <br />an attached 3 stall garage and 192 sq ft sunroom. The same builder constucted both <br />homes. <br /> <br />In discussing the price reported on the deed, Mr. Stavenes could not provide an <br />explanation on how that amount was arrived at. The appraisal value is 11 % less than the <br />assessed value. I am not comfortable in recommending lowering the assessment to the <br />private appraisal value until such time as the price reported on the deed can be explained. <br />I would also be willing to further review the appeal if more comparable sales can be <br />provided. <br /> <br />Based on these findings, it's my recommendation to take no action on the appeal. <br />However, ifthe property owner can provide additional information, he is encouraged to <br />file an abatement and the assessment will be further reviewed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.