Laserfiche WebLink
Improvements Analysis <br />15 <br /> <br />Improvements Analysis <br />The following chart shows a summary of the improvements. <br />IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS <br />Hotel <br />Number of Guest Rooms 64 <br />Restaurant/Lounge <br />Meeting/Banquet Rooms <br />Property Amenities <br />1987 Renovated: 0 <br />ROOM TYPE MIX <br />Room Type Comments No. Rooms <br />Percent of <br />Total <br />QQ/King/Suite 64 100.0% <br />Total:64 100.0% <br />Comparative Rating <br />Improvement Summary Description Good Avg. Fair Poor <br />Foundation Reinforced concrete X <br />Frame Wood/Steel X <br />Exterior Walls EFIS/Stone Veneer X <br />Interior Walls Textured and painted drywall X <br />Roof Pitched Asphalt Shingle X X <br />Ceiling Textured and painted drywall X <br />HVAC System HVAC units X <br />Exterior Lighting Incandescent fixtures X <br />Interior Lighting Recessed fluorescent fixtures X <br />Flooring Carpet and tile X <br />Plumbing Assumed adequate X <br />Elevators/Stairwells Interior Stairwells X <br />Life Safety and Fire <br />Protection <br />Sprinklered and smoke detectors X <br />Furnishings Brand standard N/A <br />Parking Concrete paved open parking X X <br />Landscaping Grass, gravel and natural forest <br />courtyards with irrigated planted <br />beds <br />X <br />Source: Various sources compiled by CBRE <br />(Limited Service Hotel)Property Type <br />1 <br />29,046 SF <br />2 <br />Number of Buildings <br />Number of Stories <br />Gross Building Area <br />Breakfast Bar <br />No <br />Brand Standard (Unit Mix Not provided) <br />2.41Parking Ratio (per 1,000 SF GBA ) <br />70 <br />11 Years <br />75.6% <br />34 Years <br />Year Built <br />34 Years <br />Typical <br />27.1% <br />Land-to-Building Ratio <br />Total Economic Life <br />Parking Spaces: <br />Functional Utility <br />Remaining Economic Life <br />Actual Age <br />Age/Life Depreciation <br />Effective Age <br />Pool, whirlpool,continental breakfast, internet <br />45 Years <br />Site Coverage <br />1.85 : 1 <br /> <br />As shown, the subject is a limited service project with features on par with an economy/lower <br />mid-scale brand. Based upon a review of the improvements no atypical features or conditions <br />were observed.