10- October 28 Planning Commission Meeting Packet
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
10- October 28 Planning Commission Meeting Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2021 11:11:38 AM
Creation date
10/22/2021 11:11:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
F. NEW BUSINESS <br />Information/Update – Crew Camp Ordinance <br />The first reading had taken place on September 20, 2021 at the County Commission meeting. A second <br />reading will take place on November 1, 2021 at the County Commission meeting for adoption. Dr. <br />Mahoney said he spoke with contractors for the diversion and they estimate hiring 1500 people, they <br />are wanting to hire mostly local workers if possible. There are approximately 3500 people that move to <br />Fargo yearly and there are no issues with housing. <br /> <br />Information/Action – KNB Industrial Development <br />KNB started building an industrial building in 2019 in Stanley Township. They were asked to submit a <br />subdivision application which they did, but it was incomplete. KNB has now split the parcel into several <br />Auditor’s Lots. Litigation has started and Ms. Peters added that they have until September 27, 2021 to <br />answer, then they will proceed to court to interpret the ordinance. Ms. Peters said that KNB may have <br />to go through the subdivision process if they lose in court, they will also have to create a deed restriction. MOTION, passed <br />Mr. Gust moved and Mr. Kapitan to support the County Commission to litigate and <br />enforce the Cass County Subdivision Ordinance. <br />On a roll call vote with all in favor, motion carried. <br /> <br />Information/Update – Matthews Property <br />Subdivision application has not been received for this property in Stanley Township. There are signs <br />indicating they are selling lots and there was a new house moved to Auditor Lot 7. The house owner is <br />unknown at this time. Mr. Quanbeck asked if they are getting easements. Ms. Puppe said they were not <br />and that they would have to follow the ordinance for a large subdivision. If there continues to not have <br />an application submitted, there may be a future injunction. <br /> <br />Mr. Gust asked if the county has had any meetings to discuss with them. Mr. Benson said there have <br />been multiple attempts to meet with the head of the board and also their legal and planning individuals. <br />They are claiming the county has no authority over townships regarding lots. This differs from the North <br />Dakota Century Code that states the county does have jurisdiction. Mr. Gust said that they could have <br />very large special assessments due to the large lot sizes. Mr. Gust added that townships may not know <br />about Planning and Subdivision ordinance policies. <br /> <br />Information/Update – Subdivision Ordinance <br />Dr. Mahoney left the meeting at 7:28am. <br /> <br />Mr. Quanbeck discussed the updates made to the draft subdivision ordinance. The new structure of the <br />ordinance will have all of the parts pertaining to minor subdivisions grouped together and separate from <br />the parts for major subdivisions. This way it will help to avoid confusion about the requirements and <br />processes for each. <br /> <br />Some of the topics that were discussed were about the current variance process along with future issues <br />it may cause to applicants who were part of the buyout process for the diversion. There will be more <br />discussion about it at the next planning commission meeting about how to handle these properties. <br />Along with the proposed process for interpretation and dealing with appeals is to have the County <br />Planner bring the issue before the Planning Commission to have discussion and a recommendation of <br />action. Then that recommendation will be brought before the County Commission. An updated draft
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.