3. Southeast Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit Improvement Plan
Laserfiche
>
Public
>
County Commission
>
2007
>
02-05-2007
>
Regular agenda
>
3. Southeast Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit Improvement Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2007 10:24:52 AM
Creation date
1/30/2007 12:58:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />For FFY 2005, of 8,620 open cases, the Fargo region had 7,499 cases with orders <br />established, for a percentage of87.0%, with the top region at 89.3%. <br /> <br />While the Fargo Unit had increased the number of cases with orders established (Line 2) <br />by 358 over the course ofFFY 2006, the gains to the measurement percentage were <br />muted by the growth in the overall number of open cases (Line 1) by 387. <br />So despite increasing the hard-count of cases with orders by 358 (by far the largest <br />increase among the 8 regions), the measurement only increased by .24. <br /> <br />The measurement's dependency on the changing number of open cases is apparent. This <br />is further demonstrated by the performance of the other regions. <br /> <br />Of the eight regions, in FFY 2006, two had improved performance of 2% or more in this <br />measure, and one other region was quite close at 1.98%. All three of those regions had a <br />reduction in Line I. In fact, two of those three regions had reductions in Line 2 as well, <br />meaning that the percentage of cases with orders went up despite the fact that there were <br />fewer cases with orders. <br /> <br />Ana~vsis <br /> <br />While the number of total cases is not something that can be controlled by the Unit, how <br />we work a case from referral to establishment is something that can be controlled. <br /> <br />Some obstacles facing the Unit's achieving the goal of increased performance are the <br />large amI growing caseload and turnover in the legal staff. <br /> <br />With a relatively large and growing caseload, the base ofthe measurement is growing as <br />well. In order for the measured percentage to grow, the number of orders established <br />must grow substantially more. As was pointed out in the description of the measurement, <br />case load growth seems to limit performance improvement. <br /> <br />Another obstacle facing the Unit is the recent turnover of legal staff. Over the last year <br />the Unit has replaced three of four staff attorneys and the administrator/attorney. While <br />the newcomers have taken to their jobs quite nicely, the fact is they replaced a group with <br />very significant child support experience. This is particularly important with this <br />performance measure since it measures an output ofthe legal group - court support <br />orders. <br /> <br />Two opportunities to increase performance in this measure are the opportunity to <br />redistribute work duties and recently provided reports from the State Office. <br /> <br />The opportunity to redistribute work duties has come through a combination of the <br />creation ofthe interstate unit and turnover. With 1,800 cases going out the door, the <br />opportunity exists to fill that void with other duties. The creation of the North Dakota <br />Outgoing Interstate Unit and the expectation of further centralized functions created some <br />capacity within the case analyst group to assume duties. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.