Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It is important to note that long term Job Access and Human Service transportation efforts in the Metro <br />Area will not be sustainable if they depend on JARC, New Freedom, or FTA funds alone. The current <br />JARC project with Handi-Wheels is successful as a demonstration project and can only serve a limited <br />number of people. The current preferred strategy for Job Access Transportation in the Metro is to continue <br />employment based dial a ride with Handi- Wheels. The Handi- Wheels model addresses the following <br />barriers: <br /> <br />· Land Use <br />· Third Shift Transportation (hours of Operation) <br />· Travel Time <br />· Childcare Transportation <br />· Access to Fargo Industrial Park <br />· Cost of Transportation & Transit <br />· Fringe Area Transit Access <br /> <br />Through the process of preparing the coordinated plan, the Metropolitan Transportation Initiative (MTl) <br />endorsed continuing the Job Access Strategy currently in place with Handi-Wheels. The project is still in a <br />pilot phase and began operating in early 2006. To fully demonstrate the effects of the project it is <br />recommended that up to two years of JARC support be given to the project. Two years of additional <br />funding will give the project time to transition from JARC to partnerships with agencies that use the <br />service. If agencies who currently use Handi- Wheels to transport their clients do not become funding <br />partners the long term viability of the projects is limited. <br /> <br />Increasing the Impact of MTI <br /> <br />It will be dependant on local and state human service agency representatives (as well as local elected <br />leaders) to make changes in the way funds are used for client transportation for the Specialized <br />Transportation Plan to be implemented. To date, no agency participating in MTl except Handi-Wheels and <br />Metro Area Transit have made substantive policy changes to support job access transportation. Examples <br />from other states and cities are endless on ways to restructure programs to allow for more clients to receive <br />transportation by growing the transportation infrastructure. <br /> <br />MTl needs to become a body that can answer questions for, and ask question of, social services and local <br />governments that receive requests for transportation dollars. There is a need to engage local elected leaders <br />to demonstrate the budgetary and societal benefits of policy change in human service transportation. MTI <br />needs to include state level policy makers and directors of local non-profits that provide transportation to <br />clients as part of their service contracts with county and state governments. MTI as a more broad based <br />(and well understood) body will serve more individuals' long term by setting a clear strategy to maximize <br />and secure funding for transportation resources. A restructure ofMTl is proposed. <br /> <br />Proposed additional/new MTl members are as follows: <br /> <br />Cass Director of Social Services <br />Clay Director of Social Services <br />Fargo City Commission (MAT Board liaison) <br />Moorhead City Council (MAT Board liaison) <br />MN & ND State DHS Representative <br />State Medicaid Representatives ND & MN <br />DT & H provider's (metro wide) <br /> <br />It is recommended MTl remain a sub-committee of the Metro COG Board. It is recommended that some of <br />the entities currently seated on MTI should either be removed or given a seat on Metro Area Transit's <br />Advisory Committee (MAT TAC). It is recommended that Metro Area Transit and Metro COG, working in <br />coordination with MTI and the M AT T AC, reorganize the makeup of both committees very early 2007. <br />The reorganization would also include a clear delineation of each committee's role and responsibility. An <br />effort is needed to ensure better communication with county government, too. <br />